How a Pro-Begich PAC Won Freedom From Harry Reid

With a critical Senate race in play, the Put Alaska First PAC wins a rare blessing from Democratic leaders to run its own operation.

ANCHORAGE, AK - JANUARY 18: Senator Mark Begich (D-Alaska) photographed near University Lake in Anchorage, Alaska, on January 18, 2013, in Anchorage, Alaska. Begich faces reelection in 2014. 
National Journal
Andrea Drusch
Aug. 18, 2014, 1:47 a.m.

Long­time Alaska polit­ic­al con­sult­ants Jim Lott­s­feldt and Art Hack­ney may not see eye to eye of­ten, but when it comes to the state’s battle­ground Sen­ate race, they do agree on one thing: Alaska races need to be run by Alaskans.

Both men have been run­ning polit­ic­al cam­paigns in the state for dec­ades, Hack­ney for Re­pub­lic­ans and Lott­s­feldt for can­did­ates on both sides. Now as their home state plays host to one of the premi­er con­tests this cycle, Lott­s­feldt and Hack­ney see the mil­lions of dol­lars pour­ing in­to the state from D.C. groups and think they’re the men to man­age it.

The prob­lem is get­ting these out­side al­lies to hand over the reins.

Lott­s­feldt runs Put Alaska First, the su­per PAC that sup­ports Demo­crat­ic Sen. Mark Be­gich and has re­ceived more than $4.5 mil­lion from the Harry Re­id-backed Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC. In fact, Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC is nearly his only donor. Both Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats agree that Lottfeldt’s ef­forts with Put Alaska First have been for­mid­able. The main tar­get of their at­tacks, Re­pub­lic­an front-run­ner Dan Sul­li­van, has watched his primary lead dwindle to the point where the NR­SC has con­sidered in­ter­ven­ing on his be­half.

But when Lott­s­feldt first presen­ted the idea of es­tab­lish­ing Put Alaska First to the Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC more than a year ago, the re­cep­tion was less than wel­com­ing.

“I de­cided to go ahead and do Put Alaska First, and the Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC folks, who I work very well with, said, ‘No, no, you don’t need to do that””just work for us, you can be our Alaska Sherpa, don’t set up an­oth­er group,’ ” Lott­s­feldt said. “I said, ‘No, I’m set­ting up an­oth­er group, be­cause at the end of the day I’m go­ing to sign off on everything we do be­cause you’re from out of state.’ “

En­trust­ing that kind of sup­port to a loc­al-level group is an an­om­aly for Re­id’s group. In­deed, Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC has act­ively per­suaded its donors not to give to sim­il­ar ef­forts in oth­er states this cycle. Both parties agree that the de­cision to sup­port Lott­s­feldt hinged on his keen know­ledge of Alaskan val­ues, as well as a need to spend wisely in a state with a com­plex pop­u­la­tion dens­ity.

“We don’t have as much money as the Koch broth­ers “¦ so we have to make sure we’re as ef­fect­ive and ef­fi­cient as pos­sible,” said Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC spokes­man Ty Mats­dorf. “Jim has an un­par­alleled know­ledge of the Alaska polit­ic­al land­scape: what plays well there, and what’s im­port­ant to people on the ground.”

Lott­s­feldt also poin­ted to Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC cofounder Re­becca Lambe, who is from the state, sug­gest­ing she knew how im­port­ant au­then­ti­city was in Alaska.

“You can al­ways tell when the D.C. folks are here; all you have to do is look at their shoes,” Lott­s­feldt joked. “When out­side people come up to run cam­paigns “¦ there’s just a lot of re­sent­ment on be­half of the loc­al people. Wheth­er it’s pro­noun­cing Val-deez in­stead of call­ing it Val-dez, or mak­ing sure that we film every ad in Alaska with real Alaskans “¦ my job is to make sure this is groun­ded on Alaska is­sues.”

The au­then­ti­city factor has chal­lenged the groups sup­port­ing Sul­li­van. One of the early Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity ads back­fired when it was re­vealed it was filmed in Mary­land. Oth­ers re­ceived cri­ti­cism from Re­pub­lic­ans in the state for fo­cus­ing too much on na­tion­al is­sues, which they say doesn’t res­on­ate in Alaska. Mean­while, Demo­crats have hammered away at Sul­li­van on hy­per-loc­al top­ics such as an Alaskan land-use bill that was op­posed by hunters and fish­ers.

That dis­con­nect frus­trates Hack­ney, who has been run­ning cam­paigns in the state for more than three dec­ades. Hack­ney is cur­rently ad­vising Amer­ic­an Cross­roads in the state, but says mil­lions of out­side dol­lars are be­ing thrown away by groups that don’t un­der­stand Alaska.

“I’m frus­trated with groups like Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity com­ing in and run­ning the same ads they’d run in oth­er states””that kind of thing doesn’t fly in Alaska,” said Hack­ney. “Neither does bat­ter­ing away with a mil­lion and a half dol­lars talk­ing about a car­bon tax. I know most of the doc­tors, law­yers, and In­di­an chiefs in Alaska and they don’t even think about a car­bon tax.”

So Hack­ney is tak­ing a page out of Lott­s­feldt’s book and start­ing his own su­per PAC called Alaska’s En­ergy, Amer­ica’s Val­ues, to sup­port Sul­li­van. He’s hop­ing that if Sul­li­van is suc­cess­ful in the primary next Tues­day, he can get Re­pub­lic­an donors to give him the same trust Demo­crats have giv­en Lott­s­feldt.

“If it comes out like we’d like it to come out, I ex­pect it will be the equi­val­ent of Put Alaska First,” said Hack­ney. “Alaska’s a pretty unique state, and hav­ing the per­spect­ive of some­body on the ground who’s been do­ing cam­paigns in Alaska for 30-something years is cer­tainly dif­fer­ent that some­body look­ing in from afar and not un­der­stand­ing all of the sub­tleties. Do I think I know bet­ter? Sure.”

For his part, Lott­s­feldt agreed. “I think Art and I see it very sim­il­arly,” he said of the two ef­forts. “Op­er­a­tion­ally, how I’m work­ing with my al­lies seems to be far more ef­fect­ive and stream­lined than what Art has to do with Karl Rove and his side.”

Sev­er­al Re­pub­lic­ans in the state also in­de­pend­ently offered that they thought Hack­ney would do a bet­ter job than the out­side groups. An­chor­age Re­pub­lic­an Wo­men’s Pres­id­ent Jude Eledge cri­ti­cized the ads she’d seen as mis­guided in their mes­sages against Be­gich.

“When you come out of Wash­ing­ton, do you really know what res­on­ates with Alaskans?” she asked. “Be­cause Art does; he has an ab­so­lute tal­ent for this.”

Hack­ney says con­tri­bu­tions to his PAC from out­side groups have been dis­cussed, but he was primar­ily tar­get­ing their donors.

“I’ve nev­er made a pitch to them dir­ectly to put money in, only that fun­ders who give money to them would be well ad­vised to give to an Alaska su­per PAC,” Hack­ney said.

If he’s suc­cess­ful, Hack­ney wants to not only change the change the mes­sage of the at­tacks on Be­gich but also dir­ect out­side money to­ward a ground game, where he feels the Demo­crat and his al­lies have a real ad­vant­age.

“To me it’s a frus­tra­tion of re­sources not be­ing spent as they could. Every­body is rush­ing to come in and throw ads on the air and the com­pet­it­ive ad­vant­age is more on the Be­gich side with the ground game that they have me­tic­u­lously put in place,” Hack­ney said.

Al­though Lott­s­feldt wouldn’t speak to the break­down of Put Alaska First’s spend­ing on TV versus the ground game, but early re­ports on the group’s form­a­tion in­dic­ated that he shared Hack­ney’s views on ded­ic­at­ing his re­sources that dir­ec­tion.

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.