• Congress Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman
John Dingell, D-Mich., and other Democrats have suggested that
Martin's plan would not go far enough.
• North Dakota Democrat
Byron Dorgan urged Martin to adopt more consumer-friendly conditions.
• Rep.
Mike Doyle, D-Pa.: "I think it's time for the consumer to become the decider of what their cell phones do -- not the cell-phone companies."
•
Greg Louer, the legislative director to Rep.
Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn.: "To essentially rig the game with open-access rules or other heavy-handed regulations will
jeopardize the potential success of the auction and not likely yield additional innovation in the wireless industry."
• Massachusetts Democrat
Edward Markey, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Telecommunications and the Internet Subcommittee, commended Martin for seeking to create "a beachhead for consumer choice and innovation." But he also
criticized the plan because it would only require about a third of the spectrum to be accessible to unaffiliated devices and software.
• Alaskan
Ted Stevens, Senate Commerce's ranking Republican, Sen.
John Sununu, R-N.H., and National Telecommunications and Information Administration Chief
John Kneuer warned that the plan to impose consumer-friendly restrictions will devalue the spectrum and could reduce revenue for the U.S. treasury.
•
Fred Upton of Michigan, the House Energy and Commerce Telecommunications and the Internet Subcommittee's ranking Republican, called Martin's proposal a "gamble." He
said, "The government shouldn't be in the business of subsidizing entry into a competitive marketplace." Upton also said burdensome restrictions like
requiring "open" networks could harm consumers.