November 22, 2008
National Journal MagazineNational Journal MagazineThe HotlineCongress DailyTechnology Daily
National Journal's Technology Daily
Search Technology Daily
 
Advanced Search
Go Wireless
TechnologyDaily Mobile

Recent Editions
Features
Issue of the Week
People Column
International Roundup
State Roundup
Executive Summary

Briefing Room
Background Papers
Bill Status
Capital Contacts
Glossaries
Password Save
Reprints
E-mail Alert
Wireless Edition
Contacts
About TD
Privacy Policy


Issue of the Week: August 4, 1999
Electronic Grass Roots Sprout On Capitol Hill

     Advocacy groups of all stripes are plugging into the Internet, allowing constituents to contact lawmakers instantly in time to influence a crucial hearing or critical floor vote, and spawning a growing business.
     But some say the growing tide of e-mail is being met with indifference on Capitol Hill and can't replace the impact of a bulging stack of "snail" mail delivered by the letter carrier.
     "When you send 5,000 postcards you don't have to read them— there's a presence," said Michael Cornfield, associate research professor and director of the Democracy Online Project at George Washington University. "If you have 5,000 or 5 million e-mails, it's just a long list."
     But congressional offices insist they respond to every piece of constituent mail — whether it's sent via e-mail, fax, or the old-fashioned way — and that they haven't seen a massive increase in electronic correspondence despite the growing number of firms aimed at getting lobbyists online.
     Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-VA, a lawmaker who has made the Internet one of his signature issues, gets about 40 e-mail messages a day.
     "We handle them like any other message from a constituent," said spokeswoman Ellen Stroud. "People usually have their one issue. I don't think e-mail has changed that."
     As a matter of security, though, Goodlatte's office — like most on Capitol Hill — responds to e-mail messages with a typed letter sent through the mail. Offices worry that e-mail responses could be forwarded and tampered with.

You've Got Mail
     E-mail flooded House and Senate in-boxes during congressional impeachment proceedings, clogging the system to a standstill, but has subsided since, according to the House Administration Committee. But while e-mail is manageable for most offices now, the committee is looking at ways to help members adapt for the future when electronic communication becomes more commonplace.
     "In the information age, when it becomes easier to send mail, what happens?" a committee spokesman asked. "With the limited budgets we have, it could be tough to keep up with the demand."
     Cornfield said that e-advocates would serve their interests by helping lawmakers find a way to manage e-mail before flooding them with it.
     "The mindset on Capitol Hill is, 'This is a nuisance'," he said. "If I were these organizations, I would use e-mail to mobilize my troops, but at the point of mobilization, I'd use telegrams, phone calls or faxes."

It's Cheaper Than A Stamp
     A number of Washington-area businesses are banking on the public's acceptance of e-mail, knowing lawmakers can't afford to ignore messages sent from the home district.
     Juno Advocacy Network, the Washington-based arm of free e-mail provider Juno Online Services, sells its ability to target specific demographic groups to advocates looking to lobby Congress or federal agencies on specific issues.
     Juno subscribers agree to view advertising in exchange for free e-mail service. The advocacy network uses specific demographic information collected from its 7 million subscribers to target ads down to specific congressional districts for lobbying campaigns.
     One recent Juno effort, on behalf of the Heritage Forest Campaign, flooded Vice President Gore's office with 171,000 e-mails, complete with names and home addresses. And for about $40,000, the National Education Association was able to generate 20,000 e-mails to House members last year in a campaign to save the e-rate, a much higher rate of return than on a direct mail campaign, a former NEA lobbyist said.
     "When you need this sort of massive outreach and you need to do it quickly. Right now we're the only service," said Roger Stone, director of Juno's Advocacy Network. "Targeting is important in commercial advertising, but it's key in politics."

Roots Strong In Cyberspace
     Stone said that advocacy campaigns, which let constituents send form letters directly to their lawmakers, cover the ideological spectrum, but their more conservative clients ask that they not be identified.
     Pam Fielding, a principal with e-advocates, spearheaded the NEA campaign when she was the union's "cyberlobbyist." She is now applying that experience in her new start-up, a subsidiary of Capitol Advantage, a Washington-based firm that provides the technical infrastructure for electronic lobbying.
     "Grass roots advocacy is alive and well in cyberspace, where folks have had trouble energizing people on the ground," Fielding said. "We are seeing a different level of activism online."
     Daniel Bennett, also a principal at e-advocates, said allowing constituents to contact their representatives more quickly is a boost to the Democratic process. Bennett knows the impact of constituent e-mail first-hand. Prior to his advocacy work, he served as technology liaison for Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-CA.
     "It's going to force members of Congress to improve, to better represent, and to be more capable of providing good reasons for why they vote," he said.

Wired By The People, For The People
     Fielding said she doesn't expect e-mail to replace personal visits with lawmakers, but said there's an advantage being able to "sit in your jammies at 11 at night and fire off a message to your representative."
     "The more involved we get constituents in the process, the more educated they will become," she said.
     Don Baptiste, founder and CEO of USADemocracy.com, leaves the advocacy up to individual constituents in what he calls "sort of unorganized grass roots."
     USADemocracy.com allows individuals to vote on specific bills, send their votes to their lawmaker via e-mail, and compare how often their lawmakers votes with them on an issue. Baptiste has been developing the site for two years and launched it last month. So far, the site, supported by advertising, has 6,000 subscribers.
     Baptiste said he hopes the site will pique individuals' interest in the political process, and ultimately get them to the polls better informed.
     "I'm interested in politics, but I'm not an activist," he said. "The idea was for the average person to communicate with Congress. Without the technology of the Internet, this wouldn't be possible."
     Jonah Seiger, co-founder of mindshare Internet Campaigns, said e-mail is good for organizing a group, but not the most effective way to send a message to Congress.
     "The political process happens in the real world," he said. "It's about votes, it's about hearings, it's about press coverage. We emphasize online organizing for offline action."
—by Rebecca Weiner


 NEW FEATURE

-Advertisement-

-Advertisement-