Why Walmart Moms Are Skeptical About Obama's Agenda

The key swing bloc of voters has seen politicians make promises before.

Updated: February 15, 2013 | 7:32 a.m.
February 15, 2013 | 7:00 a.m.

The so-called Walmart moms are hopeful Congress and the president can work to together. They're not sure they will, though. (AP photos)

Sorry, Washington, the Walmart moms aren't buying what you're selling.

At a time when President Obama looks to move his agenda through Congress, one of the crucial demographic groups he carried in 2012--mostly white, working-class women with children at home who shop at least once a month at the big-box retailer--aren't convinced by the rhetoric.

By and large, they say they hold out hope that Congress and the president can work to together on an ambitious agenda that includes helping the economy grow, reforming immigration and gun laws, and increasing the minimum wage that Obama laid out this week at the State of the Union address. But they're skeptical about whether the legislative and executive branches will actually work together.

"Every time I think positive, shit happens," said one mom from Philadelphia.

She was one of 10 mothers in Philadelphia from across racial, educational, and political backgrounds who answered about an hour's worth of questions after the State of the Union address earlier this week. Another group of 10 mothers from Kansas City, Mo., answered similar questions after the speech. I was one of a handful of reporters who reviewed recordings of the focus groups, which were organized by Democratic firm Momentum Analysis and Republican firm Public Opinion Strategies. The mothers' full names were not released. Wal-Mart sponsored the studies.

Politically, Walmart moms are interesting because they're a swing-voting group. The term was coined by POS, the Republican firm, in 2008 and refers to mothers who are mostly between the ages of 18-44, mostly white, with two-fifths to half having finished college. Their partisan affiliation tends to be evenly split. As a group, they voted for Obama in 2008, went Republican in 2010, but returned to Obama in 2012. They make up just under a fifth of the voting population.

How they'll vote in 2014 is the subject of speculation and the object of political strategists' planning, and even though as a group they helped Obama win reelection, they are not sold on the president's agenda. (None said they had seen Marco Rubio's GOP response to the State of Union; some said they read about it.)

On Obama's proposals on jobs, the moms were skeptical. Asked for a one-word reaction to his call for Congress to take up the remainder of Obama's American Jobs Act, one Kansas City mother said, "Reality." She wanted to know: "How will they do, it?" Another said "confused." The president said he'll bring jobs in, but it seems as if Americans are having a hard time getting the jobs that are already available now. She advocated more resources.

The mothers in both groups were most engaged on education, sharing strong opinions about the benefits of preschool and debating how many hours a day their kids should attend. They applauded the president's ideas. But they stopped short of endorsement.

"It's a great idea, but is he gonna follow through? I've heard it before," said one of the moms from Philadelphia.

There is similar skepticism about raising the minimum wage. The top worry is that a higher minimum wage could raise consumer prices, such as bread and gas. And, anyway, who can live on $9 an hour? many asked.

On gun control, they agreed that background checks could work to prevent violence, but they were also skeptical about additional gun-control regulations.

"It's not the guns that are killing people; it's the people that are killing people," said one Kansas City mother.

So, if they're skeptical on whether Washington will deliver on its promises, then what makes them hopeful?

"You have to have faith," one mom said.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »