SUPREME COURT

Watchdog Says Clarence Thomas Failed to Report Wife's Heritage Foundation Income

Updated: January 24, 2011 | 8:43 a.m.
January 24, 2011 | 8:32 a.m.

Justice Clarence Thomas. (TIM SLOAN/AFP/Getty Images)

Government watchdog group Common Cause says records show Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas failed to report $686,589 in income that his wife earned from a conservative think tank from 2003 to 2007.

Common Cause says IRS records show Virginia Thomas received the money from the Heritage Foundation for her work there over that period. The group’s president, Bob Edgar, said in a statement that his group discovered the discrepancy while researching any potential conflicts of interest in the Citizens United vs. the Federal Election Commission Supreme Court decision, which opened the doors for unlimited campaign contributions by corporations. 

Under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, all federal officials are required to disclose their spouse’s non-investment income. From 2003 to 2009, Thomas checked “none,” Common Cause says.

According to Steven Lubet, a Northwestern University School of Law judicial expert quoted in the Los Angeles Times, the omission is not likely to merit consequences larger than a potential civil penalty. "I am not aware of a single case of a judge being penalized simply for this,” he told the newspaper.

This is not the first time Thomas has been dragged into the national media spotlight in recent months because of his wife. In late October, Virginia Thomas left a voice mail for Anita Hill seeking an apology for Hill's sexual harassment charges during Clarence Thomas's 1991 confirmation hearings. Not long after the incident, she resigned her post as the head of conservative group Liberty Central, citing “distractions” to the organization’s mission.

Last week, Common Cause asked the Justice Department to investigate whether Thomas and Justice Antonin Scalia should have recused themselves during the Citizens United case because they attended events hosted by Charles and David Koch, billionaires who supported conservative groups that benefited from the decision.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
New Faces in the 113th Congress
2012 Election Results
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »