Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

The Age of the Promiscuous Filibuster The Age of the Promiscuous Filibuster

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member or subscriber? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

The Age of the Promiscuous Filibuster

+

(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)()

The Edge is National Journal's daily look at today in Washington -- and what's coming next. The email features analysis from NJ's top correspondents, the biggest stories of the day -- and always a few surprises. To subscribe, click here.

Chuck Hagel’s path to the Pentagon seemed more uncertain Thursday than it has at any time since the president named the former Republican senator to be his Defense secretary.

 

For a while it looked like Hagel was on a shaky but likely path of confirmation by his former Senate colleagues. Yes, he’d been slammed for everything from his comments about the “Jewish lobby” and his refusal, while in the Senate, to get behind a statement supporting tough sanctions against Iran for its nuclear program.

But after confirmation hearings in which he seemed diffident—if not listless—he appeared likely to get through with the sheer muscle of Democratic votes and endorsements by the foreign policy establishment. The committee reported him out on a party-line vote.

But Republicans are still threatening a filibuster, and Harry Reid says he doesn’t have the votes to overcome this once rare and now all too common parliamentary tactic. Hagel may still squeak by, and if it was an up-or-down vote he would likely be in. But it’s the age of the promiscuous filibuster—and anything can happen.

 

Click here for a full archive of The Edge.

Comments
comments powered by Disqus
 
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL
 
 
 
 
What should you expect from on Election Night?
See more ▲
 
Hide