Same-Sex Marriage Opponent Reverses Stance

Updated: June 23, 2012 | 10:39 a.m.
June 23, 2012 | 10:34 a.m.

David Blankenhorn, a prominent figure in the national movement against same-sex marriage, has released an op-ed in the New York Times reversing his opinion saying, "the time has come for me to accept gay marriage and emphasize the good that it can do."

Blankenhorn, the founder and president of the Institute for American Values, wrote an influential book denouncing same-sex marriage called "The Future of Marriage," and he served as an expert witness against the constitutional challenge to California's Proposition 8, which limited marriage to heterosexuals.

However, despite his new acceptance of same-sex marriage he still has concerns about its impact on marriage as a whole, but he says that "the time for denigrating or stigmatizing same-sex relationships is over."

Blankenhorn, who grew up in South Carolina and cites the civil rights movement as his "formative moral experience," never articulated his stance against same-sex marriage with an emphasis on anti-gay animus or a justification grounded in biblical or religious beliefs. He also did not oppose civil unions for gay men and lesbians.

Blankenhorn has no stomach for "culture wars" on this issue and is more interested in conciliation than in fighting.

Instead Blankenhorn previously focused his disapproval of same-sex marriage around the damage it may create for the already troubled institution of marriage in a society that sees increasing levels of "unwed childbearing, nonmarital cohabitation and family fragmentation among heterosexuals."

"I had hoped that the gay marriage debate would be mostly about marriage's relationship to parenthood," said Blankenhorn. "But it hasn't been."

In the spirit of comity and respect for the dignity of homosexual love, Blankenhorn now has a new agenda: Instead of fighting gay marriage, he would like to build new coalitions between same-sex and heterosexual married couples to strengthen the institution of marriage.

He does not know if it will work, but he wants to find out.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

10:43 p.m.

Latest Response by Gabriel Roth: But do we not drive to save time?

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

GOP’s Switch on Financial Disclosure Wins Gold Medal in Hypocrisy Olympics

9:30 p.m.
The IRS scandal evolved from the broader reality that the GOP has changed its financing mantra from “disclosure” to “secrecy.”
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
More Columns »