POLITICS

Ryan: No Mandate for Obama in Election

The Wisconsin congressman maintains objections to raising taxes.

Updated: May 30, 2013 | 12:13 a.m.
November 13, 2012 | 7:14 p.m.

Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., speaks to supporters during a campaign stop at Byer Steel, Tuesday, Sept. 25, 2012, in Cincinnati. (AP Photo/David Kohl)

Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, fresh off a loss in his bid to be vice president under former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, said on Tuesday that he does not believe voters gave President Obama a mandate to govern in last week’s election.

“They also reelected the House Republicans, so whether people intended or not, we've got divided government," Ryan told ABC News’ Jonathan Karl in his first national interview since the loss (he also spoke with Wisconsin media outlets on Monday).

Had voters fully embraced the president -- and by extension, his call to raise taxes on top earners -- “they would have put Nancy Pelosi in charge of the House of Representatives,” Ryan said.

Democratic House candidates actually won more total votes than their Republican counterparts, according to Ian Millhiser at the liberal blog ThinkProgress. But the way districts are drawn allowed Republicans to maintain the majority they won in 2010.

Ryan, who is expected to receive the necessary waiver to remain the head of the House Budget Committee during the next term, returned to Congress on Tuesday to prepare for the lame-duck session. During the ABC interview, he said that politicians will have to ensure that divided government yields progress going forward, even though it “didn’t work very well in the last two years.”

Still, ahead of any deals being cut, Ryan is maintaining his opposition to any increase in tax rates, saying that closing loopholes will be “a better way” to raise government revenue.

"Raising tax rates hurts economic growth. And of all things we need right now--to prevent a fiscal cliff, prevent a recession, prevent a debt crisis--is we need people to go back to work," Ryan told Karl. "There are other ways of getting more revenue into our government without damaging the economy, and that's the kind of thing we hope to achieve."

Ryan pledged to “continue to be a champion of ideas” (House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, calls him a “policy wonk”), but declined get more specific about what kind of deal might be reached with Democrats.

“I don’t want to get into negotiating with the media,” he said.

He had only kind words for Romney’s efforts, calling it "exactly the kind of campaign that I would have run” as the party’s nominee. Ryan said the election took him by surprise because the polls and data he had seen had given him a “pretty optimistic view.”

“It was a bit of a shock when we didn't win, but that's just the way these things go,” he said.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

1:57 p.m.
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

June 17, 2013
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Why We Lack Good Privacy Guidelines

June 13, 2013
Technology innovations have served to strip away privacy. They could also be the key to restoring it.
More Columns »