CAMPAIGN 2012

Paul Likely to Sit Out Senate Race

Texas lawmaker says he'd rather run for Barack Obama's seat than Kay Bailey Hutchison's.

Updated: May 3, 2011 | 1:43 p.m.
January 20, 2011 | 1:05 p.m.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., seen here with his dad, Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, won't be getting any paternal supervision in the Senate. (AP Photo/Ed Reinke)

It looks like the “Ron Paul revolution” won’t be hitting the Senate floor after all.

Despite reports that the Texas congressman is eying the Senate seat that will be opening up with the retirement of Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, Paul told National Journal today that a presidential bid is still a more viable option for 2012.

A Senate run “only crosses my mind because people ask me about it,” said Paul, whose son and fellow Republican, Rand Paul, was sworn in as Kentucky's junor senator earlier this month. “I don’t think it’s a real possibility.”

Paul said the Senate buzz amplified Wednesday when the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling released poll results that showed him in second place for Hutchison’s seat among Republican primary voters, just 2 percentage points behind Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst.

But, as the release notes, “a host of candidates [are] furiously putting together staffs and campaign plans to enter what should be a crowded field” in the Senate race. Paul said an obvious marker of his disinterest is that he “[hasn’t] even thought about” putting a staff together.

“Right now I’ve been concentrating on dealing with my new subcommittee,” he said, referring to his recent appointment as chair of a House panel on domestic monetary policy. That role could determine whether he runs for the White House again. Paul has run for president twice: In 1988, he was the Libertarian nominee, and in 2008, he ran unsuccessfully for the GOP nomination but gained an impassioned following for his libertarian views and winsome debate style. 

In September, Paul said a presidential bid hinged largely on “the fall of the U.S. dollar.” Now, he says, he's waiting to see whether the strength of the nation's currency improves before deciding whether to run.

And when does he expect to make an announcement?

“Whenever I have to,” he laughed.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
New Faces in the 113th Congress
2012 Election Results
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »