Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Rompocalypse Now? Rompocalypse Now?

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member or subscriber? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Opinion

Rompocalypse Now?

Mitt Romney did all the things conservatives wanted him to do, and they're still not happy with him, because he hasn't managed to do those things in a way that would put him ahead of President Obama in the polls. After months of taking the advice of conservative bloggers and pundits — Romney picked Paul Ryan as his running mate, the entire Republican National Convention was built around mocking Obama's "you didn't build that" line, his spokespeople consistently clarified away any statement Romney has made that seemed out of sync with right-wing talking points on "Obamacare," abortion, and immigration — and yet, according to poll averages, he is losing both nationally and in swing states. Someone must be to blame! And conservatives in the punditocracy are pretty sure it's not them.

The main scapegoat is Stuart Stevens, Romney's top strategist, both in and following a report posted on Sunday by Politico's Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei suggesting that the Romney campaign is in disarray. Stevens gets the blame for a convention speech that didn't mention the war or the troops, the Clint Eastwood speech, a cheesy bus tour idea, a message focused solely on the economy and how Obama has failed to fix it. Immediately following the story, Romney's campaign explained to a whole bunch of other news sites exactly how Romney's strategy is about to change. Those changes are:

 

• Turn the election into a vote on "status quo versus change," Stevens told Politico.

• Talk about more than the economy, including foreign policy, China, the national debt, and cutting $500 billion a year in spending, the Financial Times reports.

• But also talk about culture war stuff, especially God, BuzzFeed reports.

 

• Refocus on the economy and spend two and a half weeks explaining his five-point economic plan, The Washington Post reports.

Hot Air's Ed Morrissey notices that some of those things seem somewhat contradictory, and concludes that the Romney campaign is not struggling to come up with new ideas, but that "the media’s narrative-building apparatus is in disarray." However, he has to include conservative media in that disarray. Last week, the regular media wondered if Romney was doomed. Talk of the Romney campaign's new strategy or (strategies) comes as the conservative media has joined in on the doomsaying. But they do not see a single cause of Romney's struggle. Here are some disparate reasons for the doom, according to conservatives:

Too many advisers. "His message is not selling. His ads are not very good. He has hundreds of staffers in Boston and I’m guessing too many cooks in the kitchen," RedState's Erick Erickson writes in a post titled "If The Election Were Held Today Barack Obama Would Win."

The top adviser is too vain. Stevens did not participate in The New Republic's "fawning" profile of him, "but those things do not happen by accident," Erickson says in a second post. Romney aide Eric Fehrnstrom seems much more loyal by contrast.

 

Not enough advisers. National Review's Rich Lowry writes that "even people who like Stevens and wish him well say that he simply has too many jobs within the Romney campaign."

The campaign is bad at explaining itself. Romney has "poor surrogates," takes too long to respond to the news, won't get specific, and hasn't been able to push back against the idea that the race is "between Bill Clinton and George W Bush," The Washington Post's Jennifer Rubin writes.

Comments
comments powered by Disqus
 
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL
 
 
 
 
Make your Election Night headquarters.
See more ▲
 
Hide