VOTING RIGHTS

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Punts on Voter ID Decision

The state's high court sends the case back to a lower court for a ruling on whether it will remain in effect for the Nov. 6 election.

Updated: September 18, 2012 | 3:26 p.m.
September 18, 2012 | 2:16 p.m.

The legal fate of Pennsylvania’s controversial voter ID law remains unclear after the state Supreme Court's ruling on Tuesday sending the case back to a lower court.

The court in its 4-2 decision returned the controversial voter ID case to the commonwealth court that originally upheld the law, to discern whether the state can actually get proper identification into the hands of voters before Election Day. It declined to rule on the constitutional issues involved in the voter ID law, which civil rights groups say is a Republican ploy to keep Democratic voters away from the polls.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court readily conceded that the law is not currently being implemented the way it was intended—to allow “liberal access” to alternate ID cards for those who do not already have an acceptable form of photo ID, such as a driver’s license. The court also said the law was creating barriers to voting access for "the most vulnerable segments of our society (the elderly, disabled members of our community, and the financially disadvantaged)."

The Supreme Court asked the lower court to determine whether the law could be implemented in a way that would not disenfranchise voters in the next two months -- and if it finds in the negative, to issue an injunction to stop it from taking effect. The lower court was ordered to make a ruling on or before Oct. 2.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

14 minutes ago

Latest Response by Margo Thorning: Capitalize on Robust U.S. Natural Gas Sources

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

17 minutes ago

Latest Response by Marty: Pick Up the Pace on Export Approvals

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

20 minutes ago

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Nat Gas: Exports are Not the Only Issue

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »