Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Omission Accomplished: Marco Rubio's Telling Failure to Mention Iraq Omission Accomplished: Marco Rubio's Telling Failure to Mention Iraq

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation



Omission Accomplished: Marco Rubio's Telling Failure to Mention Iraq

The dogma of reflexively interventionist senators cannot survive a confrontation with reality, so they simply ignore it.

Perusing the text of Marco Rubio's foreign-policy speech at the Brookings Institution, I notice a word that doesn't appear: Iraq. It's so hard to believe that I've read the speech twice and executed a word search three times. Did he think no one would notice? The senator from Florida has given a lengthy address about the wisdom of American intervention without so much as acknowledging the most consequential foreign intervention that we've undertaken in decades.  

This is the same Marco Rubio who says that George W. Bush, whose presidency was defined by Iraq, did a fantastic job. As recently as last fall Rubio was fearful that the United States was leaving Iraq too quickly. Back in 2010 he avowed that the war there made America safer and better off. 

But Iraq has now disappeared from his analysis of American foreign policy. He manages to avoid talking about Iraq even as he frets that Iran is attempting to rule the rest of the Middle East. Does Rubio ever ponder what recent military campaign effectively increased the Iranianns' influence in the region?

Latest Politics Posts:
Loading feed...


Says Michael Brendan Dougherty, "Rubio's speech is a remarkable political document. It shows that some senators have learned nothing from the past decade." He's mostly right, but there is one important caveat. The interventionists have apparently learned to stop acknowledging the Iraq war, because their vague generalities about America's role in the world cannot survive a confrontation with a decade of costly, catastrophic intervention. Better to pretend the debacle never happened, even while ratcheting up the rhetoric about Syria and Iran. 

It's a perfect distillation of how ideological and divorced from empiricism the neoconservative project has become. A subject is raised at length -- but the most relevant real-world example isn't. Rubio is making foreign policy for a fantasy world, and we'd all be better off if someone bought him a Risk board so that he could work out his delusions of strategic acumen with fewer consequences. 

comments powered by Disqus