Obama's Mention of Gay Rights May Raise Eyebrows Among Black Backers

Linking gay rights to civil rights is not without risks.

Updated: January 21, 2013 | 6:39 p.m.
January 21, 2013 | 3:18 p.m.

Seattle supporters, at a May fundraiser, approve of Obama's stance on marriage. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson) ()

By linking the founding moments of women's rights (Seneca Falls, N.Y.), African-American rights (Selma, Ala.), and gay rights (Stonewall Inn), President Obama stepped forcefully into a politically charged zone.

He became the first president to mention the word "gay" and the issue of gay rights in an inaugural address, according to ABC News. While praised by gay-rights advocates, the remark might raise eyebrows in the African-American community, where social conservatism runs deep, as does skepticism about gay rights.

One indication of how divisive the issue can be in the black community: Prince George's County, just outside D.C. in Maryland, is 65 percent black. On Election Day, it voted 90 percent to 9 percent for Obama over Mitt Romney. But on the same day, on a ballot measure in Maryland to legalize same-sex marriage, it voted only 51-49 in support.

"We, the people, declare today that the most evident of truths -- that all of us are created equal -- is the star that guides us still; just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall ... ," Obama said.

He was referring to Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in New York City's Greenwich Village that was the site of a 1969 riot and subsequent protests over a police raid.

Obama may have tipped his hand about the administration's position on two gay-rights cases the Supreme Court will hear this term. At issue is whether marriage is constitutionally protected for gay couples.

"Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law -- for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well," Obama said.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

11:44 a.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: A Breath of Fresh Air

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

6:22 p.m.

Latest Response by Brigham McCown: U.S. Lacks Coherent LNG Policy

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

3:06 p.m.

Latest Response by Deron Lovaas: A Dynamic, Changing Economy and Society

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

No Wonder Republican Criticism of Obama Isn’t Working

May 23, 2013
They’re attacking the president where he’s least vulnerable at a time when they have minimal credibility.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Smaller Schools Aren’t Always Better

May 23, 2013
The universities best able to expand access to education are the ones with the most students.
Reid Wilson: On the Trail

Parties Push For House Retirements

May 23, 2013
Campaign committees utilize scare tactics to pressure members to step aside.
More Columns »