Obama's Isolationist Turn

The president avoided foreign policy during his State of the Union address.

Updated: February 13, 2013 | 3:07 p.m.
February 13, 2013 | 2:26 p.m.

Obama's State of the Union address Tuesday included little on North Korea or Syria.(AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, Pool) ()

Take a look at two State of the Union addresses, both the first of a president’s second term—President Bush’s 2005 address and President Obama’s address Tuesday night. There's a glaring difference: Obama devoted about half the number of words to foreign policy that Bush did. Obama mentioned Syria, had a line about Iran, spoke about drawing down the American presence in Afghanistan. He pledged greater transparency on the nation’s use of drones and spoke about working through international partners.

On the same day Obama delivered his address, North Korea had just conducted another nuclear test. But Obama offered little tough talk against North Korea. Instead, he simply warned that North Korea “will only achieve security and prosperity by meeting their international obligations” and “provocations of the sort we saw last night will only further isolate them, as we stand by our allies, strengthen our own missile defense, and lead the world in taking firm action in response to these threats.”

In his latest State of the Union, Obama mentioned Syria once, saying his administration will “keep the pressure on a Syrian regime that has murdered its own people and support opposition leaders that respect the rights of every Syrian.” That’s consistent with what we’ve seen recently from Obama, who vetoed a plan promoted by the State Department and CIA, and backed by Pentagon leaders, to arm Syrian rebels.

In this view, Obama’s pick of Chuck Hagel as Defense secretary makes sense, given that both have been wary of American military intervention.

There’s little political incentive at home to Obama to alter his approach. Americans have grown war-weary, and the president receives high marks on foreign policy. His approval rating on foreign policy is at 53 percent, according to a recent Gallup survey.

When Obama said Tuesday night that the war in Afghanistan will soon be over, the House chamber was filled with members of Congress from both parties standing and applauding. (Notable exceptions: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, House Speaker John Boehner, and Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham.) Even Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, in the GOP response to the State of the Union, didn’t mention foreign policy or criticize Obama’s approach abroad.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:32 a.m.

Latest Response by Margo Thorning: Capitalize on Robust U.S. Natural Gas Sources

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:29 a.m.

Latest Response by Marty: Pick Up the Pace on Export Approvals

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:26 a.m.

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Nat Gas: Exports are Not the Only Issue

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »