Obama's Gun-Control Package Polls Well, With One Big Caveat

Two different pollsters can get wildly different results because of how the questions are worded.

Updated: May 30, 2013 | 12:23 a.m.
January 17, 2013 | 11:28 a.m.

(AP Photo/LM Otero)

Another common question concerns Americans' priorities balancing laws that restrict gun ownership with Second Amendment rights. The most recent United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll asked respondents, "What do you think is more important — to protect the right of Americans to own guns, or to control gun ownership?" That poll found a slight majority, 51 percent, thought controlling gun ownership was more important, while 46 percent chose the right of Americans to own guns. (A Pew Research Center poll, conducted by the same survey firm, found similar results on this question.)

But a slight tweak of that question can affect the result. The AP/GfK poll asked, "Do you think that laws limiting gun ownership infringe on the public's right to bear arms under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, or do you think they do not infringe on the public's right to bear arms?" In that poll, 51 percent said those laws would infringe on the right to bear arms, and 41 percent said they do not.

An even more significant difference is evident when Americans are asked about specific proposals. In the AP/GfK poll, 55 percent support "a nationwide ban on the sale of military-style, rapid-fire guns." The Congressional Connection Poll found only 46 percent support for "banning semiautomatic guns, which automatically reload when the trigger is pulled." On the other hand, Pew found that 58 percent favor "a ban on semiautomatic weapons," the same percentage that support "a nationwide ban on the sale of assault weapons" in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll. Gallup/USA Today asked respondents if they were "for or against a law which would make it illegal to manufacture, sell, or possess semiautomatic guns known as assault rifles," finding 44 percent in favor, and 51 percent against.

Anzalone noted some of this rhetorical massaging in president's proposals. "They specifically called them military-style assault weapons," he said.

"It's smart," said Anzalone. "These are weapons of soldiers, and not weapons of hunters."

Republicans also see school security as a helpful issue. The new CNN/Time/ORC poll shows that more Americans, 47 percent, think "proposals to put armed guards in every school in the country ... would do more to reduce the amount of gun violence in our nation's schools," while only 40 percent think "proposals to enact stricter gun laws" would do more.

"I think you'll see some Republicans begin to say, 'What happened [in Connecticut] was awful, even evil,' " said Anderson. "Now the question is [over] using the evil acts of a mentally deranged person a reason to take away the legal rights of law-abiding citizens."

Despite the strong poll numbers earned by armed guards in schools, proponents of stricter gun laws still see the data, on balance, as evidence that this represents their best opportunity to strengthen laws restricting firearms. Omero pointed to the ABC News/Washington Post poll, which showed 88 percent of Americans support "background checks on people buying guns at gun shows" (and a CBS News/New York Times poll released Thursday showed support for background checks on all prospective gun purchasers at an overwhelming 92 percent.)

"The needle has absolutely moved more than we've seen after past tragedies," said Omero. "It's a month out and these numbers continue to move toward stronger gun laws."

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

1:57 p.m.
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

June 17, 2013
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Why We Lack Good Privacy Guidelines

June 13, 2013
Technology innovations have served to strip away privacy. They could also be the key to restoring it.
More Columns »