Gun Control: Cuomo's 2016 Presidential Play

Governor uses annual address to satisfy the national Democratic base.

Updated: January 10, 2013 | 2:24 p.m.
January 10, 2013 | 6:30 a.m.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo delivers the State of the State on Wednesday. (AP Photo/Mike Groll) ()

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's aggressive advocacy for some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation is already heightening speculation that he's already seriously thinking about a presidential campaign in 2016.

In his State of the State address Wednesday afternoon, Cuomo dropped numerous hints that he's thinking as much about his national prospects as his gubernatorial re-election in 2014. "This is New York, the progressive capital," Cuomo said in his address. "You show them how we lead. We can do it."  On gun control, he bellowed: "No one hunts with an assault rifle. No one needs 10 bullets to kill a deer," he said. "End the madness now!"  He even made a nod to women's rights, proposing a New York version of President Obama's Lily Ledbetter Act, requiring women to be paid the same as men when performing equal work.

"From Andrew Cuomo's perspective all that matters is that if you do a good job in the spot you're elected to you might have the chance to move on to the next level," said Hank Sheinkopf, a long-time New York State Democratic operative.

This is a marked shift for the New York governor. Despite having the same last name as his famously liberal father, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo hasn't exactly ingratiated himself with the Democratic base since being elected governor of the Empire State. He made quite a few liberals angry over his treatment of unions and for his position in a New York State Senate political coup that resulted in Republicans sharing power in the state legislature even though Democrats elected more members.

But nationally, he's regularly touted as a contender for the Democratic presidential ticket in 2016. So when he called for sweeping gun-control reforms in his State of the State address on Wednesday, he wasn't just responding to the tragedy in Newtown. He was making a shrewd long-term political calculation.

"Everything with Cuomo is politics," added a national Democratic strategist with experience in New York campaigns. "He could have done anything he wanted on gun control in his first two years, but now it's in the headlines."

In a Quinnipiac University poll taken before the Newtown shooting but after shootings in Colorado and Wisconsin, 61 percent of New Yorkers said they favored tougher gun laws, and seven in 10 Democrats said they think gun control is more important than gun rights, according to a separate Pew Research Center poll. The gun issue is effective for Cuomo because it scores him points among progressives but also does not upset Cuomo's well-heeled donor base, strategists say, since New York's gun laws are already among the nation's toughest. It's not clear yet exactly how much farther the new proposals would go. In his annual address, Cuomo called for the "toughest assault weapons ban in the nation."

Cuomo's political positioning is in many ways the reverse of neighboring Republican governor Chris Christie of New Jersey. Cuomo is courting his base after ticking them off in his first two years in office, while Christie is tacking to the center after playing to conservatives for most of his term.  Another similarity is the high approval rating both governors have after Sandy -- in the 70 percent range -- and both have amassed significant political capital to pursue ambitious initiatives.

"[The gun control issue] is just like Christie's Sandy hurricane response," said Democratic media Joseph Mercurio, who also teaches political communications at Fordham University. "He's proven to be a very effective governor in those terms. This is just one more in a series of things that will make him be an appreciated official at a higher rating."

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:33 a.m.

Latest Response by Michael Schmidt: Debate is Microcosm of Energy Policy

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

6:25 p.m.

Latest Response by Jack Rafuse: The LNG Export Conundrum: Dow Chemical

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:23 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Export more LNG to fight climate change

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »