CAMPAIGN 2012

Five Things We Learned From Santorum's Sweep

Updated: March 6, 2012 | 9:15 a.m.
February 8, 2012 | 11:56 a.m.

web:455617:article

1. Retail politics at work. Rick Santorum left Nevada days before the caucuses there, heading to the Midwest to speak with conservative-minded voters in Minnesota, Missouri, and Colorado. Out of all the GOP presidential candidates, he spent the most time canvassing these states, and it showed.

2. Conservatives are unsure of Mitt Romney. Santorum appears to some Republicans as the last true conservative remaining in the race. Even without exit polls, it seems reasonable to say that Santorum appealed to tea partiers, evangelicals, and very conservative voters, while Romney had issues appealing to the base.

3. With Newt Gingrich gone, Santorum snags his conservative support. The absence of Gingrich gave Santorum a chance to go nearly 1-on-1 with Romney, assuming the role as the top anti-Romney candidate. The anti-Romney vote has split between Gingrich and Santorum, with Gingrich taking the lead in South Carolina. With him gone, Santorum won voters with similar ideological profiles.

4. Santorum's lack of drama gave him an edge on Gingrich. In the Midwest, Santorum portrayed himself as a conservative minus the controversies that have dogged Gingrich's campaign, which appealed to evangelicals and social conservatives.

5. Republican voters want an Obama opposite. Santorum's contrasted himself with President Obama, telling supporters: "I don't stand here to claim to be the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney; I stand here to be the conservative alternative to Barack Obama." He also said that Romney's biggest assets are his money and organization, advantages that will disappear in the general election, and Santorum encouraged voters to look for the candidate who contrasted the most with Obama. 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

6:25 p.m.

Latest Response by Jack Rafuse: The LNG Export Conundrum: Dow Chemical

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:23 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Export more LNG to fight climate change

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:14 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Export more LNG to fight climate change

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »