POLITICS

Do Jon Huntsman and Joe Manchin Have Independent Presidential Aspirations?

Updated: January 3, 2013 | 12:36 p.m.
January 3, 2013 | 12:01 p.m.

While we're on the topic of Chris Christie and independent political movements, here's an interesting item from No Labels, the grassroots organization dedicated to bipartisan problem-solving: Republican Jon Huntsman and Democrat Joe Manchin are its new national leaders.

Could this mean that the former Utah governor and the senator from West Virginia have national ambitions? Yes: Operatives close to both men say that Huntsman and Manchin, like most successful politicians, consider themselves presidential timber.

And might their national ambitions conflict with the ossified ideology of their particular parties? Yes: Manchin, a former West Virginia governor, is a conservative Democrat in a left-moving party. Christie, ideologically conservative, ticked off partisan colleagues by applauding President Obama's response to Hurricane Sandy.

As I wrote on Thursday morning, Christie's broadside against House GOP leadership is a savvy political move. It suits the times, if not his party.

"As governors, both Jon Hunstman and Joe Manchin developed well-earned reputations as problem solvers," said No Labels cofounder Mark McKinnon in a release announcing the new leadership. "That's precisely the attitude we need more of in Washington."

Via Twitter, Democratic pollster Mark Mellman disputed the contention in my Christie post that the New Jersey governor "may be the smartest man in politics." But he added in a follow-up tweet, "Totally agree on voter frustration."

We caught up by telephone. I clarified that my post was not a measure of Christie's IQ but rather his political smarts. Mellman said he agreed that the political landscape is fertile for an independent presidential bid, despite the "enormous staying power" of the Democratic and GOP parties.

"People are very frustrated. They are almost to the point of giving up," Mellman told me. "Truth is, they have given up. If not for self-imposed crises like the fiscal cliff and the debt ceiling, people would have no reason to be engaged."

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Most Read Articles
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »