Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Common Cause Asks DOJ to Investigate Scalia and Thomas Over Citizens United Common Cause Asks DOJ to Investigate Scalia and Thomas Over Citizens U...

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member or subscriber? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Supreme Court

Common Cause Asks DOJ to Investigate Scalia and Thomas Over Citizens United

+

Common Cause contends that Virginia Thomas (left), wife of Justice Clarence Thomas (right), worked for a group that benefited from a decision he made on a key campaign finance case.(Jennifer K. Law / AFP /Getty Images)

The government reform advocacy group Common Cause today asked the Justice Department to investigate whether Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia should have recused themselves from the landmark Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission decision because they were involved with an array of conservative groups that stood to benefit from it.

In the case, the Supreme Court by a 5-4 margin struck down a provision of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance act that prevented corporations and unions from spending an unlimited amount of money on electioneering, such as campaign ads. Scalia and Thomas sided with the majority in the decision, which was made a year ago this week.

 

In a letter addressed to Attorney General Eric Holder, Common Cause President Bob Edgar said both justices should have been disqualified from hearing the case because of their ties to Charles and David Koch, wealthy brothers who fund an array of conservative causes.

The justices both attended “retreats” held by Koch Industries, Edgar said, that focused on championing conservative ideas including opposition to campaign finance laws.

Their attendance raises the question of whether the two judges were impartial in their decision, Edgar said. He also questioned Thomas's impartiality because his wife, Ginny, ran a nonprofit group that Edgar said benefited greatly from the Citizens United decision.

 

“Until these questions are resolved, public debate over the allegations of bias and conflicts of interest will serve to undermine the legitimacy of the Citizens United decision,” Edgar said.

Common Cause and other government-reform groups have railed against Citizens United for a year, arguing it allows legal bribery by corporations that now have unlimited influence in elections. The electoral landscape did change significantly in the wake of the case, with an array of mostly conservative groups airing advertisements costing millions of dollars that helped the GOP to historic gains on Election Day.

Comments
comments powered by Disqus
 
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL