Cliffs Notes on Obama's 2013 State of the Union Address

Updated: February 12, 2013 | 11:13 p.m.
February 12, 2013 | 10:20 p.m.

(AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) ()

The first State of the Union address since President Obama's second inauguration focused overwhelmingly on domestic policy. He devoted roughly one paragraph each to Afghanistan, Iran, and North Korea, which tested a nuclear weapon on Monday. For comparison's sake, that's roughly the same amount of time he spent on cybersecurity in Tuesday's address.

Obama called for tax and entitlement reform, energy and education spending, as well as immigration reform and gun control, though he didn't offer many details on how to achieve the goals. Here's a look at the key issues Obama's hour-long speech addressed:

On the sequester

The cuts to the military in the sequester are a bad idea, Obama said, but he did not lay out a path to replacing those cuts.

 "These sudden, harsh, arbitrary cuts would jeopardize our military readiness. They’d devastate priorities like education, energy, and medical research. They would certainly slow our recovery, and cost us hundreds of thousands of jobs. That’s why Democrats, Republicans, business leaders, and economists have already said that these cuts, known here in Washington as the sequester, are a really bad idea.

"Now, some in this Congress have proposed preventing only the defense cuts by making even bigger cuts to things like education and job training, Medicare and Social Security benefits.

"That idea is even worse."

On Medicare

Obama acknowledged that the "biggest driver of our long-term debt is the rising cost of health care for an aging population." He argued his Affordable Care Act reduced long-term health care costs and called for reducing taxpayer subsidies to drug companies.

"I’m prepared to enact reforms that will achieve the same amount of health care savings by the beginning of the next decade as the reforms proposed by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles commission.… We’ll bring down costs by changing the way our government pays for Medicare, because our medical bills shouldn’t be based on the number of tests ordered or days spent in the hospital—they should be based on the quality of care that our seniors receive."

On tax and entitlement reform 

In a line reminiscent of the fiscal-cliff debate, Obama warned against cutting entitlement spending, a position that is sure to frustrate Republicans. He also acknowledged the political difficulty of reform, while implying his stay-the-course position is better.

"Why would we choose to make deeper cuts to education and Medicare just to protect special-interest tax breaks? How is that fair? Why is that deficit reduction is a big emergency justifying cuts in Social Security benefits, but not closing some loopholes? How does that promote growth? I realize that tax reform and entitlement reform won’t be easy. The politics will be hard for both sides. None of us will get 100 percent of what we want. But the alternative will cost us jobs, hurt our economy, and visit hardship on millions of hardworking Americans. "

On jobs and the economy

Obama asked Congress to pass the jobs plan he presented to the last Congress but that did not make it to his desk. He praised American manufacturing and used some of the speech's firmest, but also flashiest, rhetoric when talking about jobs and the economy.

"Let me repeat: Nothing I’m proposing tonight should increase our deficit by a single dime. It’s not a bigger government we need, but a smarter government that sets priorities and invests in broad-based growth."

On energy

Obama warned about the dangerous effects of climate change, strongly suggesting that superstorm Sandy was caused by global warming. He suggested the U.S. could achieve energy independence and focused on clean energy and natural gas. He called for an Energy Security Trust to use public lands for energy.

"Solar energy gets cheaper by the year—so let’s drive costs down even further. As long as countries like China keep going all-in on clean energy, so must we.

"In the meantime, the natural-gas boom has led to cleaner power and greater energy independence. That’s why my administration will keep cutting red tape and speeding up new oil and gas permits. But I also want to work with this Congress to encourage the research and technology that helps natural gas burn even cleaner and protects our air and water."

On education

The president acknowledged rising tuition costs, proposing a scorecard that parents and students considering college can use to determine how to get the most value for their money. While he dedicated six paragraphs of the speech to education, he did not call for sweeping reforms, instead calling on colleges to "do their part to keep costs down." He asked Congress to change the Higher Education Act "so that affordability and value are included in determining which colleges receive certain types of federal aid."


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

10:43 p.m.

Latest Response by Gabriel Roth: But do we not drive to save time?

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

GOP’s Switch on Financial Disclosure Wins Gold Medal in Hypocrisy Olympics

9:30 p.m.
The IRS scandal evolved from the broader reality that the GOP has changed its financing mantra from “disclosure” to “secrecy.”
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
More Columns »