Christie Tepid Toward Obama's Gun-Control Proposals

N.J. governor argues gun measures need to be part of a "complete package."

Updated: January 9, 2013 | 9:41 a.m.
January 9, 2013 | 8:29 a.m.

(AP Photo/Mel Evans)

The politics of the gun-control debate was on full display Wednesday morning as New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie declined to say he would support President Obama if he proposes a ban on assault weapons.

Matt Lauer asked Christie that very question on The Today Show, but Christie pushed back.

"If that's all he proposes? If it's part of the program. All you're focusing on right now is gun control. What about the violence in our video games? … We need to have a conversation about all these things. We had a woman back in Camden who decapitated her child and then killed herself, high on crack. If we don't [deal] with the substance-abuse issue and mental-health issue that leads to violence, we're shortchanging the conversation," Christie said.

For Obama, Christie's hesitation to come out whole-heartedly in favor of gun control shows just how difficult it will be for the president to win over moderate Republicans such as Christie and conservative Democrats who rely on their good standing with the National Rifle Association to win support in their states and districts. 

For Christie, who also appeared on Morning Joe and reiterated that any gun control would need to be part of a "complete package," standing with the president on this issue complicates his position in the GOP if he plans on running for president in 2016. Christie came into office pursuing a conservative agenda, but since superstorm Sandy hit, Christie warmed to Obama, complimented his leadership, and blasted House Republicans for failing to bring a relief bill to the floor soon enough. Siding with gun-control advocates would be a surefire way to weaken the governor's national position if he has ambitions to run for president in 2016.

But 2016 is far away when you're facing voters at home in 2013. For now, Christie is laser-focused on rebuilding the coastline, mentioning the storm by name 33 times in his State of the State address on Tuesday.

"Some things are above politics. Sandy was and is one of those things," the governor said.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »