OPINION

Bush's FEMA Director Criticizes Obama's Response to Sandy for Being Too Speedy

Updated: October 30, 2012 | 8:38 p.m.
October 30, 2012 | 8:24 p.m.

While Romney surrogate Chris Christie is making waves for the heaps of praise he's been giving the president all morning for his emergency preparedness, one guy who is unimpressed with the president's response is the old FEMA director who was in charge during Hurricane Katrina. Think Progress found this quote from Michael "heckuvajob Brownie" Brown criticizing the president for responding to the storm too quickly:

“One thing he’s gonna be asked is, why did he jump on [the hurricane] so quickly and go back to D.C. so quickly when in ... Benghazi, he went to Las Vegas?” Brown says. “Why was this so quick? … At some point, somebody’s going to ask that question…. This is like the inverse of Benghazi.”

Brown was famously criticized for his reaction to Hurricane Katrina efforts in 2005. He was told by President Bush, despite all of the criticism, that he was doing a "heckuva job."

The important thing to consider here is that these quotes came on Monday afternoon, before the storm hit. Newt Gingrich criticized the president for the same thing over the weekend, too. On Sunday's episode of This Week with George Stephanopoulos, Gingrich went after the president for cancelling campaign events ahead of the storm. "You’ll notice he’s canceling his trips over the hurricane. He did not cancel his trips over Benghazi," he said. This line of thinking is ridiculous, whether it's coming from Brown or Gingrich, considering the amount of destruction that happened overnight. The difference between Benghazi and Sandy is that the storm was a catastrophic event we could see coming, allowing for proper preparation, and not a surprising event that blossomed and played out over the following few days. And the criticism, anyway, is ultimately empty: The essential message isn't that Obama has responded to Sandy unsatisfactorily, it's that Republicans would really like the wider world to start criticizing Obama's response to the attack on the U.S. consulate. In other words, it's an attempt to change the subject.

Atlantic Wire

Latest Wire Posts:
Loading feed...

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

11:03 a.m.

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »