Bloomberg Pushes Gun Control by Not Pushing Gun Control

You might expect an attack on on guns, but you'd be wrong.

January 18, 2013 | 8:00 a.m.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg speaks at a gun violence summit at Johns Hopkins. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky) ()

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg might be the face of the gun-control group Mayors Against Illegal Guns and the chief financier of the similarly focused Independence USA PAC, but don't expect political ads targeting lawmakers to focus exclusively on guns.

President Obama is pushing Congress to take a tough vote on a slate of gun-control issues, including an assault weapons ban, and Bloomberg's PAC is poised to support gun-control advocates and punish opponents.

If the past is any guide--the PAC spent $8.1 million in the 2012 cycle--the ads we could see won't be just about guns. Bloomberg supports gun control, but that doesn't mean the group will overtly mention the issue when targeting lawmakers.  

The highest-profile example of this came in 2012 in California, where Rep. Joe Baca, a pro-gun Democrat, lost his seat to fellow Democrat Gloria Negrete McLeod. Bloomberg's PAC dumped over $3 million into the contest and its ad criticized Baca for siding with water polluters. Guns? Didn't get a mention in the TV spot. The reason? Gun control does not necessarily win elections, and winning elections is the name of the game.

"You have twin goals. One is to focus on and elevate the gun issue. The other is to win the race," New York Deputy Mayor Howard Wolfson told National Journal last month.

Then there's the case of Republican Rep. Daniel Webster of Florida, whom Independence USA criticized as a Washington insider who was cozy with lobbyists. Webster's opponent, Val Demings, was a former police chief and gun-control advocate, and though she lost, the PAC spent about $2.4 million backing her.

Earlier this week, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel made the point that any gun-control vote in Congress would be tough for a number of members, and he argued that when elections roll around again, "we have a responsibility to support our friends." 

That seems to be a lesson the mayor understands. 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:33 a.m.

Latest Response by Michael Schmidt: Debate is Microcosm of Energy Policy

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

6:25 p.m.

Latest Response by Jack Rafuse: The LNG Export Conundrum: Dow Chemical

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:23 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Export more LNG to fight climate change

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »