CAMPAIGN 2012

Atheists Group Grades Obama, Romney

October 16, 2012 | 1:53 p.m.

A national group of atheists gave President Obama a lukewarm grade and Mitt Romney a failing grade on statements and actions touching on topics of religion and government entanglement.

The highest grade in the Secular Coalition’s Presidential Scorecard for the 2012 elections was a “B,” given to Libertarian Gary Johnson. Democrat Obama received a “C” and Republican Romney was hit with an “F.” Green Party candidate Jill Stein was handed an incomplete.

This Presidential Election Scorecard was produced by the Secular Coalition for America, which serves as the national lobby for atheists, agnostics, humanists and other nontheistic Americans.

The four candidates considered for the scorecard were those whose names appear on the ballots in enough states to garner the required 270 electoral votes to be elected president. Grades were based on candidates’ public statements and actions related to religion-government entanglement on topics of “government and values,” health and safety, education, government funding and government acts.

The coalition argues that with the rise of the Christian Right, religion has gained prominence in U.S. elections. Now, for the more than 45 million voting age non-religious Americans, says the coalition, its scorecard provides information on where each candidate stands on issues important to them.

“While voters choose candidates for many reasons and based on many issues, we hope the Secular Coalition’s scorecard will be one more tool they use to inform their decision,” said the group’s executive director, Edwina Rogers, in a statement.

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

8:23 p.m.

Latest Response by William O'Keefe: LNG: A Rising Tide Does Raise All Boats

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

6:39 p.m.

Latest Response by Laura Barrett: P3s Must Be Accountable to Public

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

5:16 p.m.

Latest Response by Marlo Lewis: Central Planning: Bad Export Policy

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »