Are Chuck Hagel’s Views Outside the Mainstream?

Updated: February 20, 2013 | 4:21 p.m.
February 20, 2013 | 4:14 p.m.

(Chet Susslin)

Defense secretary nominee Chuck Hagel will have his second chance at confirmation next week, when the Senate returns to session. But in assessing why the GOP opposition has been stronger and more unified than expected, pundits largely missed the most significant reason his nomination has stalled.

It’s not because of any personal slight between him and Sen. John McCain of Arizona; that doesn’t explain why 40 other Republicans blocked him. It’s not because the party is as confrontational as ever; if so, Secretary of State John Kerry wouldn’t have received 94 votes for confirmation. It is because his views on the U.S-Israel relationship defy the traditional congressional consensus on the issue.

That’s why conservative, pro-Israel groups headed by Bill Kristol bought cable ads attacking Hagel’s Middle East record. That’s why liberal-leaning Jewish groups such as the American Jewish Committee and Anti-Defamation League released statements this weekend raising fresh questions about Hagel’s speeches. That’s why Maryland Democratic Sen. Ben Cardin’s rabbi delivered a sermon last month, declaring: “From our perspective, outside of Pat Buchanan and Al Sharpton, I can’t think of a worse choice!”

Hagel’s support among Democrats is wide, but not deep. Out of deference to the White House, Democrats have remained unified, despite concerns about Hagel’s positions. As Bob Woodward reported on Fox News Sunday, several Democratic senators called the White House to see if he was withdrawing.

Hagel is still likely to be confirmed. But Republican opposition would be minimal if his long trail of public statements on Israel were more in line with mainstream views in both parties.

A version of this post also ran on The Edge, National Journal's daily look at today in Washington -- and what's coming next. The email features analysis from NJ's top correspondents, insights on the biggest stories of the day -- and always a few surprises. Subscribe here.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

3:21 p.m.

Latest Response by Tim Peckinpaugh: LNG Exports: Let the Market Decide

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »