Politicians like to have a character to refer to in their stump speeches to criticize their opponent's position -- a widow without health care, a Wall Street banker's fat bonus -- but after unrelenting emphasis on Mitt Romney's career at Bain, President Obama has made his opponent and prop one and the same. The ad the Obama campaign released on Saturday, "Firms," got a lot of attention for its soundtrack, which is Romney singing "America the Beautiful" like a nonprofessional singer. But it's the tagline that comes at the end, after the camera pans over exotic locals with headlines about Romney's offshore accounts, that really matters: "Mitt Romney's not the solution. He's the problem."
No one seems to think there's anything illegal in Romney's tax returns. Indeed, the Republican rationale for releasing them is that the details of his finances can't be any worse than what their candidate is currently weathering. Rep. Ron Paul told Politico on Tuesday, "Politically, I think that would help him." He follows former Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley, George W. Bush adviser (and National Journal columnist) Matthew Dowd, Weekly Standard's editor Bill Kristol, conservative columnist George Will, former Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, and Fox News' Brit Hume. Steve Schmidt, who ran John McCain's campaign in 2008, when Romney was vetted as a possible running mate, said there was nothing disqualifying in his returns. The worst-case-but-still-possible scenario, according to Bloomberg Businessweek's Josh Green, is that Romney paid no taxes in 2009. That would look bad politically, but it wouldn't be illegal or even immoral.
It would, however, perfectly fit the narrative that Obama has been running on ever since he began his political career. "Right now, we have a tax code that gives incentives for companies to move offshore. Instead, we must have a tax code that rewards companies that are doing the right thing." That isn't an attack ad, that's state legislator Obama running for Senate in June 2004, as quoted by the Chicago Defender. Running for president in May 2008, he told CNN's Wolf Blitzer, "We have seen a lack of shared prosperity. So, you've got CEOs making more in a day than ordinary workers are making in a year, and it's the CEO that's getting the tax break, instead of the workers. He even pledged in that interview, "I will raise CEO taxes. There is no doubt about it." Since that campaign and at least until 2010, Obama has criticized the Bush tax cuts as "tax cuts for people who don't need them and weren't even asking for them." And last September, in his jobs speech at Congress, he struck that familiar refrain about the lack of fairness in the tax system. "While most people in this country struggle to make ends meet, a few of the most affluent citizens and most profitable corporations enjoy tax breaks and loopholes that nobody else gets. Right now, Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary -- an outrage he has asked us to fix." Eleven days later, he gave another speech, saying Republicans should have to defend tax "unfairness -- explain why somebody who's making $50 million a year in the financial markets should be paying 15 percent on their taxes, when a teacher making $50,000 a year is paying more than that -- paying a higher rate. They ought to have to answer for it."
That attempt to make Buffett — a guy who supports Obama — an example of one of the people who benefiting from an unfair system didn't go so well. Especially for his secretary. And in fact, Democrats have struggled since at least 2005 to find the perfect tax villain for their pro-middle-class tax argument.