CAMPAIGN 2012

Advisers Tell Ron Paul to 'Attack' Rivals in Debate, But He Doesn't Want To

October 18, 2011 | 9:32 a.m.

Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, said his advisers are telling him to "attack" his Republican presidential rivals during the debate on Tuesday night in Las Vegas -- but he doesn’t want to.

"I’ve had some advisers tell me that: 'Go after him! Attack him!'" Paul said of GOP rival Herman Cain. “But that’s my least favorite thing to do."

"I will when I’m pressed and I’m challenged, or if they challenge my supporters," Paul continued, speaking Tuesday on CNN's American Morning. "Then I get annoyed and I feel offended when they do that, so I take that personally.” Paul said he believes all his Republican rivals, including Cain, the former Godfather's Pizza executive, are qualified to be president.

Still, Paul bashed Cain’s "9-9-9" tax proposal as a “dangerous plan” that “compromises in the worst way.”

Cain's plan “gives you a sales tax and a flat tax and opens the door to a value-added tax,” Paul said. “I don’t think it’s going to tax those who have bigger incomes. It’s a regressive tax. People are going to get a 9 percent sales tax and don’t even have jobs right now? … I think the more people know about it, the more questions will be asked.”

Paul defended his own recently-unveiled economic plan, which he says will cut $1 trillion in spending by eliminating five federal departments and the Transportation Security Administration in addition to ending America’s combat missions abroad. Paul would immediately eliminate the departments of Energy, Housing and Urban Development, Commerce, Interior, and Education. War spending would be terminated. Most other departments' spending would be capped at 2006 levels.

With his “No. 1 attack” on overseas spending, Paul said there are “enough places to cut” in the current budget that Medicare can be left alone. “We don’t need to attack the elderly,” he said. “We have made promises. That was a contract, even though it’s not the best program in the world… I think if we cut elsewhere we don’t have to put people on the streets.” Paul said his plan does address Social Security by letting “young people opt out.”

The libertarian candidate, who has long advocated for smaller government, said he isn’t making changes to his strategy in Tuesday's debate. “I’m going to do exactly what I’ve been doing for as long as I can remember,” he said.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


More By This Writer
Sara Sorcher's Pic
Sara Sorcher | Staff Writer, National Security
ssorcher@nationaljournal.com | Follow:    
Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
New Faces in the 113th Congress
2012 Election Results
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »