Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

A Coming Wave of Gay-Marriage Electoral Victories? A Coming Wave of Gay-Marriage Electoral Victories?

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member or subscriber? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

ANALYSIS

A Coming Wave of Gay-Marriage Electoral Victories?

The electoral process has not been kind to advocates of gay marriage. Again and again, states--32 in all--have voted against it at the ballot box, even in liberal bastions such as California, which passed Proposition 8 in 2008. The latest blow came in May, when North Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment banning same-sex unions by a 22-point margin.

 

But that could all change in November. Four states have marriage-related ballot initiatives this fall, and gay-rights activists are cautiously optimistic that their side could win most or all of them--a potentially historic turning of the tide.

The pro-gay-marriage side leads in the latest polls of the ballot measures in Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, and Washington state. Here's a breakdown of where things stand on the question of whether gay marriage should be legalized in each state:

MAINE (WBUR, June):

 

Yes: 55 percent

No: 36 percent

MARYLAND (Hart Research Associates, August):

Yes: 54 percent

 

No: 40 percent

MINNESOTA (Public Policy Polling, June):

Yes: 49 percent

No: 43 percent

WASHINGTON (PPP, June):

Yes: 51 percent

No: 42 percent

The Human Rights Campaign, which on Monday announced it is putting $1 million into the four states' pro-gay-marriage campaigns, believes that this will be the year things turn around for same-sex marriage at the polls. "We are poised to turn the tide," HRC's Michael Cole-Schwartz told me, although he stopped short of predicting a clean sweep: "That could mean all four states or just some of them; it's too early to tell."

But advocates are convinced that their long line of shutouts will come to at least a partial end. "While we had, unfortunately, a losing streak, those losses date back to 2004 and 2006," Cole-Schwartz said. "In 2012, we're working in an entirely different environment."

Public opinion has shifted rapidly in favor of gay marriage in recent years; a recent CNN poll found 54 percent of Americans supporting legal recognition of "marriages between gay and lesbian couples," part of a long-term public-opinion trend in that direction. Since President Obama came out in favor of gay marriage in May, there's evidence the position has gained even more support among Democrats, particularly African-Americans, and the Democratic Party recently announced that the party platform, to be approved in Charlotte, N.C., next month, will have a pro-gay marriage plank.

Also working in the measures' favor is the fact that all four are on the ballot in liberal-leaning states unlikely to be contested in the presidential election. The measures differ slightly: In Minnesota, gay-marriage advocates are hoping to beat back another state constitutional amendment banning gay marriage; in Maryland and Washington, antigay marriage groups are hoping to overturn marriage liberalization laws passed by state legislatures; and in Maine, a referendum question to legalize gay marriage would, if passed, supersede a 2009 voter referendum banning it.

Supporters of gay marriage also believe they have gotten more sophisticated with their approach to messaging. New ads in Washington, such as the one above, emphasize the love and commitment of gay couples. Earlier efforts tended to highlight the rights and benefits that come with marriage, such as hospital visitation, but research has shown that that's a less convincing approach. "It doesn't capture the emotional connections people have with marriage," Cole-Schwartz said.

It would, however, be premature to declare victory for gay marriage at the ballot box. Efforts to ban same-sex marriage have frequently lagged in public polling only to prevail on Election Day, noted Brian Brown, president of the National Organization for Marriage, which backs such efforts. Brown said his group has so far given about $600,000 to the state anti-gay marriage efforts and plans to spend more than $1 million. (The Human Rights Campaign's new $1 million expenditure brings the group's spending on this year's initiatives to nearly $5 million.)

"Obviously, these are difficult states," Brown said in an interview. "But again and again, traditional marriage has won, even in difficult states. The people of this country have not changed their view that marriage is the union of a man and a woman." In California, he noted, nearly every preelection poll showed Proposition 8 losing, but it won by nearly 5 percentage points. (The initiative banning same-sex marriage has since been ruled unconstitutional and is likely to be examined by the Supreme Court next year.)

"In every single battle, [before] every state vote, we've heard this is the one we're going to lose. It gets a little old," Brown said. "The only poll that counts is the vote, and we've never lost the vote."



Latest Politics Posts:
Loading feed...

Comments
comments powered by Disqus
 
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL