‘We Don’t Suck As Much!’ A Motto Your Party Can Honestly Embrace

Dumbing victory down, Democrats and GOP measure themselves not by problems fixed but by Pyrrhic battles won.

Speaker of the House John Boehner (C), R-OH and National Security Advisor Susan Rice listen as US President Barack Obama delivers a statement on Syria during a meeting with members of Congress at the White House in Washington, DC, September 3, 2013.
Ron Fournier
July 16, 2014, 1 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama has won the de­bate over how to deal with the im­mig­ra­tion crisis on the south­ern bor­der. That is, if you ac­cept the White House’s dumbed-down defin­i­tion of suc­cess: Be a little less bad than the Re­pub­lic­ans.

You’ve heard the least-lousy spin be­fore. Obama’s job ap­prov­al rat­ings are at the low­est point of his pres­id­ency, but House Speak­er John Boehner’s num­bers are much lower.

The Demo­crat­ic Party is bleed­ing voters to the in­de­pend­ent column, but more voters are bolt­ing the GOP.

The pub­lic’s faith in the pres­id­ency it at a near-re­cord low, but lice and cock­roaches are stat­ist­ic­ally more pop­u­lar than Con­gress.

It’s in­dis­put­ably true that Obama’s first term fell far short of his prom­ise””Amer­ic­ans lost their au­da­city to hope for change””but he won a second term! After a bru­tally neg­at­ive reelec­tion cam­paign, Re­pub­lic­an Mitt Rom­ney was found to be a few per­cent­age points less ac­cept­able than the in­cum­bent. That was no ac­ci­dent. In The Mes­sage, a book by lib­er­al au­thor Richard Wolffe, Obama strategist Dav­id Axel­rod re­calls the joke about two men who chance upon a bear in the woods. One freezes. The oth­er starts run­ning, know­ing he doesn’t have to out­run the bear; he just has to out­run his pal. “So the elect­or­ate was the bear,” Axel­rod says, “but all we had to do was out­run Rom­ney.”

The Demo­crat­ic Party motto ought to be, “We don’t suck as much!”

That’s the best news out of a Wash­ing­ton Post/ABC News poll on the in­flux of un­ac­com­pan­ied for­eign chil­dren along the Texas bor­der. Nearly six out of 10 Amer­ic­ans (58 per­cent) dis­ap­prove of Obama’s man­age­ment of the crisis, in­clud­ing 54 per­cent of His­pan­ics.

But, wait, the GOP num­bers are worse! This from a lib­er­al mouth­piece: 

 

Yes, two-thirds of those polled dis­ap­prove of how Re­pub­lic­ans law­makers have ad­dressed the is­sues, in­clud­ing about half of all GOP voters.

That should be little con­sol­a­tion for a pres­id­ent who called im­mig­ra­tion re­form a top second-term pri­or­ity, a bow to the His­pan­ic com­munity that gave him 70 per­cent of its votes and now dis­ap­proves of his hand­ling of the bor­der crisis.

Obama blames the fail­ure of re­form on House Speak­er John Boehner and oth­er Re­pub­lic­an law­makers who won’t defy their anti-am­nesty base, which is a fair as­sess­ment of the situ­ation today. But the pres­id­ent re­fuses to ac­know­ledge that re­forms also failed to pass a Demo­crat­ic-con­trolled Con­gress in 2009 and 2010, when cer­tain lead­ers of his party””if not the pres­id­ent him­self””pre­ferred not to fix the prob­lem and lose a cudgel against Re­pub­lic­ans.

Facts are nettle­some things, and com­pet­ency is not a pre­requis­ite for polit­ic­al suc­cess if the oth­er side acts worse. For­tu­nately for the Demo­crat­ic Party, the GOP of­ten ob­liges.

The White House is count­ing on its least-lousy frame to pre­vail this fall in red states where Demo­crat­ic sen­at­ors are cling­ing to their seats. The strategy is es­sen­tially to tell voters, You’re not happy with your Demo­crat­ic sen­at­or or the pres­id­ent, but the Re­pub­lic­an chal­lenger is so ex­treme that don’t have an al­tern­at­ive. A GOP can­did­ate like Tom Cot­ton in Arkan­sas may be far enough out­side the main­stream for the plan to work, as it did in 2010 and 2012 to dis­qual­i­fy some Re­pub­lic­an chal­lengers.

The cyn­ic­al strategy works for Re­pub­lic­ans, too. In 2004, Pres­id­ent Bush knew the pub­lic was turn­ing against him, so he es­sen­tially ar­gued that he wasn’t as bad as Demo­crat John Kerry. Today, the House GOP de­flects cri­ti­cism by com­par­ing the size of its warts to the Demo­crats’.

This is no way to run a coun­try. When both parties in a two-party sys­tem meas­ure them­selves not by prom­ises kept and prob­lems solved but by the Pyrrhic vic­tor­ies awar­ded to least-lousy com­batants, you get what we’ve got in this coun­try: Re­cord-low trust in gov­ern­ment, a broken polit­ic­al sys­tem, and a deeply dis­il­lu­sioned pub­lic. These may be the sad legacies of both Boehner and Obama.

To those on the far right and far left who will ac­cuse me of “false equi­val­ence,” I beg your par­don and say, OK, the oth­er side sucks a bit more. Feel bet­ter? The rest of us don’t.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×