A Brief History of GOP Calls for Obama’s Impeachment, From Benghazi to Bergdahl

Allen West is hardly alone.

Rep. Allen West talks to reporters while flanked by his fellow house republican freshman about an extension to the payroll tax cuts, in Washington, D.C., on Monday, Dec. 19, 2011.
National Journal
Emma Roller
June 3, 2014, 9:50 a.m.

Al­len West wants Pres­id­ent Obama to be im­peached over the Taliban pris­on­er swap.

In a blog post titled, “The case for im­peach­ment of Barack Hus­sein Obama,” the Flor­ida Re­pub­lic­an and former con­gress­man wrote that ex­chan­ging “trait­or” Army Sgt. Bowe Ber­g­dahl for five Afghan Taliban mem­bers should be an im­peach­able of­fense.

After sup­posedly go­ing AWOL, Ber­g­dahl was cap­tured by the Taliban and held in Afgh­anistan for five years. The five seni­or Taliban mem­bers who were re­leased had been de­tained at Guantanamo Bay, and will now spend an­oth­er year in Qatar. (As a re­fresh­er, un­der the Con­sti­tu­tion, the pres­id­ent may be im­peached for “treas­on, bribery, or oth­er high crimes and mis­de­mean­ors.”)

“Why would the United States ac­qui­esce to the de­mands of a non-state, nonuni­form ter­ror­ist or­gan­iz­a­tion — the Taliban? The Taliban is our en­emy and it is not a na­tion-state with whom we should enter in­to ne­go­ti­ations,” West wrote on Tues­day. “Ladies and gen­tle­men, I sub­mit that Barack Hus­sein Obama’s uni­lat­er­al ne­go­ti­ations with ter­ror­ists and the en­su­ing re­lease of their key lead­er­ship without con­sult — man­dated by law — with the U.S. Con­gress rep­res­ents high crimes and mis­de­mean­ors, an im­peach­able of­fense.”

Back in 2010, Jonath­an Chait pre­dicted that by the end of Obama’s second term, the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives would vote to im­peach him. “Wait, you say. What will they im­peach him over?” Chait wrote. “You can al­ways find something. Mini-scan­dals break out reg­u­larly in Wash­ing­ton.”

The Ber­g­dahl af­fair (and West’s as­ser­tion that it’s an im­peach­able of­fense) is the latest it­er­a­tion of these “mini-scan­dals.” The dif­fer­ence is that, un­like the scan­dal sur­round­ing Benghazi and the IRS’s per­ceived polit­ic­al tar­get­ing, this presents an on­go­ing threat. If one of the re­leased Taliban op­er­at­ives were to be­come in­volved in a fu­ture ter­ror­ist at­tack, that’s when it evolves in­to a full-grown, adult scan­dal.

Here’s a short run­down of oth­er White House scan­dals (or “scan­dals”) that have led Re­pub­lic­ans to call for Obama’s im­peach­ment (and for the full list, Wiki­pe­dia has you covered):

Few things get tea-party con­ser­vat­ives’ blood boil­ing faster than Benghazi, the IRS scan­dal, and the Af­ford­able Care Act. But it’s not just middle-class Joes at tea-party ral­lies who get ex­er­cised about the idea of im­peach­ing the pres­id­ent. Last week, McKay Cop­pins wrote about up­per-crust con­ser­vat­ives’ ef­forts to join the Im­peach Obama move­ment. At a tony event at the Har­vard Club in Man­hat­tan, elite con­ser­vat­ives cel­eb­rated the re­lease of a new book titled Faith­less Ex­e­cu­tion: Build­ing the Polit­ic­al Case For Obama’s Im­peach­ment.

The book’s au­thor, An­drew Mc­Carthy (a former fed­er­al pro­sec­utor), does not dir­ectly ar­gue for ac­tu­ally im­peach­ing Obama. In­stead, Cop­pins wrote, he “makes a more sub­dued ar­gu­ment; that Obama has ab­used his of­fice, and that act­ively threat­en­ing im­peach­ment is the best way for Con­gress to reign in the powers of the ex­ec­ut­ive branch.”

In this way, Re­pub­lic­ans can con­cede that im­peach­ing Obama is an un­likely scen­ario — but they’re good at stay­ing on mes­sage non­ethe­less.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×