Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Obama Agrees to Address Congress on Sept. 8 Obama Agrees to Address Congress on Sept. 8

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation



Obama Agrees to Address Congress on Sept. 8


Sometimes, give it a rest: There are right times and wrong times to check in, so keep away from that Blackberry before next year's State of the Union address.(Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images)

President Obama agreed to address a joint session of Congress next Thursday, at the invitation of House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, the White House announced late Wednesday.

But Thursday was not Obama's first choice—he originally asked to address Congress on Wednesday night, Sept. 7. A month after they went toe-to-toe over the nation’s debt, Obama and Boehner slugged it out on Wednesday over the calendar and the president’s desire to give a speech to Congress.


(RELATED: Text of Obama's Letter to Boehner, Reid)

That night was supposed to belong to the Republicans. It was to be a showcase for the eight GOP contenders for president, a chance to use two hours of national television coverage of their debate in California to bash Obama. A chance to look presidential. But with only 198 words in a letter to the leaders of Congress, Obama  reminded them who is president right now.

From National Journal:
PICTURES: Meet the GOP 2012 Hopefuls

Obama At 45 Percent Against Romney, Perry

VIDEO: Charlie Cook's 2012 Republican Bracket

Irene Highlights Need to Fix Flood Program

Fed Minutes Reveal Deep Divide on Economy


But it took Boehner only another 268 words in his own letter later in the day to remind Obama that while he is president, he does not dictate the schedule of the House of Representatives. Boehner reclaimed Wednesday for the GOP, suggesting that Thursday was a better day for the commander in chief to come to the House chambers to give what the White House hopes will be the marching orders in the battle to revive a weak economy.

Noting that the House will not be in session on Wednesday until 6:30 p.m., Boehner argued there just isn’t enough time to have the president in as a guest at 8 p.m. “With the significant amount of time—typically more than three hours—that is required to allow for a security sweep of the House chamber before receiving a president,” wrote Boehner, “it is my recommendation that your address be held on the following evening, when we can ensure there will be no parliamentary or logistical impediments that might detract from your remarks.”

Even as they acceded to Boehner's alternate date, the White House strongly disputed any suggestion by Republicans that they were blindsided by the president’s letter requesting Wednesday. “Boehner’s office was consulted about the 9/7 date before the letter was released,” said a White House official who asked not to be named. “No objection (or) concern was raised.”

The White House is acutely aware that by moving the speech to Sept. 8, they now find the president pitted against a ratings behemoth much tougher to overwhelm than any candidates’ debate—the kickoff of the NFL season, with the defending Super Bowl champion Green Bay Packers taking on the New Orleans Saints at 8:30 p.m. EDT. The game will be broadcast on NBC. The White House indicated on Thursday that Obama's speech will end before the start of the game.


In deciding on the grandest possible venue to unveil Obama's jobs plan and in picking Sept. 7 even though it clashed with the Republican candidates’ debate in California, the White House was playing political hardball. But it is also ratcheting up the pressure to deliver a program that is more than just a rehash of past proposals and is bold enough to put the economy on a course more positive than today’s.

If Obama falls short on that measure, if his proposal looks timid or inadequate, he could regret seeking that large stage. But that will not be known until later. The immediate impact is on politics, and it assuredly leaves the eight challengers steaming and the debate sponsors miffed.

In his letter requesting the audience, the president placed his speech above politics. “Washington needs to put aside politics and start making decisions based on what is best for our country and not what is best for each of our parties in order to grow the economy and create jobs. And we must answer this call,” he wrote. (Both chambers of Congress would have to approve such a session by passage of a joint resolution.)