Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

E-Petitioning: How … Harnesses E-Democracy in Politics E-Petitioning: How … Harnesses E-Democracy in Politics

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation



E-Petitioning: How … Harnesses E-Democracy in Politics

The petition is one of the oldest tools in American politics. The Declaration of Independence invoked the colonists’ petitions to King George III, and the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution enshrined the right to petition government for a redress of grievances. From the Boston Tea Party to the modern marches for civil rights and against abortion, action by citizens to petition their rulers has been a part of American democracy.

Then came the Internet. Given the ease of spreading information, online petitions took off. In 1998, amid the impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, Web designers Wes Boyd and Joan Blades (think: the “flying toaster” screen saver) sent a simple “censure and move on” petition to 100 friends. The result was, one of the largest e-organizations in the United States, with more than 7 million members today.


But until recently, online petitions were widely considered a bit of a sham. In 2010, Clay Shirky, an expert in new media at New York University, accused political organizations of alarming people into signing petitions that Congress would never read as a means of expanding their lists of e-mail recipients and possible donors. And while numerous websites offer free tools to start an online petition, the costs for mass e-mailing can be daunting.

This has all changed in the past few months. Online petitions on political issues have exploded in popularity. Some have triggered media coverage and forced authorities to act—notably, the plea by black teenager Trayvon Martin’s parents that his killer face arrest and prosecution, or food blogger Bettina Siegel’s recent campaign to persuade the federal Agriculture Department to ban “pink slime” from ground beef served in schools.

Much of this surge can be traced to a single company. is a classic example of the overnight sensation that took five years to succeed. Founded in 2007 by Ben Rattray and two other young Stanford alumni, the site originally tried to spark activism by making it easy for anyone to launch a cause or to generate support for a charity. No dice; donors could contribute to a charity directly. Then Rattray hired dozens of bloggers, each devoted to a particular issue—gay rights, global warming—and started to draw attention on the Internet by enhancing their success in search-engine results.


Early last year, he discovered the formula that turned his company into an online powerhouse. A South African human-rights activist, Ndumie Funda, used a petition-drafting tool tucked away in a corner of’s website, hoping to press her government to declare the “corrective rape” of lesbians a hate crime after her same-sex fiancée was gang-raped and died.’s editors and bloggers drew attention to the cause, but it was the direct and personal nature of Funda’s appeal that provided authenticity and power. The more than 170,000 signers worldwide prompted media coverage that moved the South African government to create a task force—including Funda—to examine the issue.

“The way that that exploded internationally was a huge wake-up call for us,” said Ben Wikler, the website’s executive vice president. The site was reprogrammed so that anyone can start and circulate a petition for free, taking advantage of Facebook, Twitter, and other social-media outlets. When a petition gains traction, staffers help to fine-tune the language and draw media attention—and the company bears all the costs of sending e-mails to potential signers. now generates 15,000 new online petitions a month—three times as many as last fall—and reached 12 million users in April, 2 million more than in March. (The company counts a user as anyone who signs a petition, creates an account, and doesn’t unsubscribe from e-mails.) Traffic to the website soared from 4 million unique visitors last December to 11 million this March amid the furor over the Trayvon Martin case, and it settled back to 8 million in April, according to Google Analytics internal data. Wikler predicted that “based on the underlying growth rate,” will surpass March levels within a few months.

“The core idea of is to do for online campaigning what YouTube did for video,” Wikler said. “With YouTube, anyone could post a video, and it could actually go viral. It takes 30 seconds to start a petition on [, and] you don’t have to pay for servers if it gets to millions of people.… The barrier to entry is zero. And if you strike a nerve, you have an institutional rocket pack.”

Around the time that made this pivot, MoveOn launched a similar tool called, which lets members start their own petitions and offers institutional support for causes that earn the membership’s attention. In just over a year, Director Steven Biel said, the website has created more than 18,000 petitions, and more than 600 gained enough traction to use MoveOn’s master e-mail list. Those campaigns have brought surprising victories, such as Utah Gov. Gary Herbert’s recent decision to veto a bill banning sex education in schools. Since Trayvon Martin was killed, Biel added, “we’ve seen a wave of African-Americans using to demand justice for family members killed under racially suspicious circumstances.”


This article appears in the June 9, 2012 edition of National Journal Magazine.

comments powered by Disqus