Opinion

On the Border Between Two Americas

Border-patrol surge brings enforcement without accountability, putting politics ahead of people.

Fernando Garcia is the executive director of the Border Network for Human Rights based in El Paso, TX.
National Journal
Fernando Garcia
March 26, 2014, 5:41 a.m.

When Amer­ic­ans think about our south­ern bor­der with Mex­ico, the first thing that comes to mind for many is, sadly, a law­less, desert re­gion filled with drug run­ners and smug­glers. This ca­ri­ca­ture of the bor­der per­vades the minds of many who live far from the re­gion and cer­tainly the polit­ic­al dia­logue that ex­ists in Wash­ing­ton today.

The real­ity is that our bor­der com­munit­ies are quint­es­sen­tial Amer­ic­an com­munit­ies. They are among the safest cit­ies in the coun­try. We are di­verse in our pop­u­la­tions and in­nov­at­ive in our ap­proach to eco­nom­ic de­vel­op­ment and en­tre­pren­eur­ship; in many ways, we provide an in­sight in­to the fu­ture of the United States. In a re­port my or­gan­iz­a­tion re­cently re­leased, “The New El­lis Is­land: Vis­ions From the Bor­der for the Fu­ture of Amer­ica,” loc­al law-en­force­ment of­fi­cials af­firm that “the crime rate in bor­der counties is lower than in non-bor­der counties and crime levels have been de­creas­ing for years.”

Still, politi­cians con­tin­ue to per­petu­ate the im­age of a law­less bor­der re­gion to jus­ti­fy a con­stant in­crease in bor­der en­force­ment. They have suc­ceeded in cre­at­ing the largest law-en­force­ment agency in the United States. In ad­di­tion to re­cord num­bers of bor­der agents, re­cent en­force­ment surges have fun­ded bor­der-se­cur­ity strategies that lack fo­cus on the real threats to our na­tion, while fail­ing to de­liv­er much-needed re­sources to our ports of entry. Even as bor­der cross­ings dropped drastic­ally dur­ing and after the re­ces­sion, we’ve seen a massive in­crease of “boots on the ground” with in­suf­fi­cient train­ing and very little ac­count­ab­il­ity. As a res­ult, bor­der com­munit­ies have seen in­creases in ex­cess­ive “use of force” and civil-rights vi­ol­a­tions in­volving res­id­ents and mi­grants alike.

At the end of Feb­ru­ary, a re­port com­mis­sioned by U.S. Cus­toms and Bor­der Pro­tec­tion to re­view its “use of force” policy and prac­tices was leaked to the press. The re­port, writ­ten by the Po­lice Ex­ec­ut­ive Re­search For­um, con­cluded that CBP agents reg­u­larly pro­voke in­cid­ents that res­ult in the deadly use of force. It also noted there is a “lack of di­li­gence” in the in­vest­ig­a­tions after use-of-force in­cid­ents oc­cur.

For those of us who live in bor­der towns and cit­ies, these rev­el­a­tions about the bor­der patrol come as no sur­prise. We star­ted or­gan­iz­ing ourselves 15 years ago to make sure that our voices are heard by those in Wash­ing­ton who set these policies. The polit­ic­al con­ver­sa­tion can’t seem to get away from “how much” bor­der patrol. We’d like to start talk­ing about “what kind of” bor­der patrol this coun­try needs.

But we haven’t waited for Con­gress to take ac­tion. Bor­der Net­work for Hu­man Rights has cre­ated a “Mod­el of En­gage­ment with Law En­force­ment” that has en­abled our loc­al bor­der-patrol sec­tor — which stretches from West Texas and in­cludes all of New Mex­ico — to make some of these changes ad­min­is­trat­ively.

This com­munity ca­pa­city is not the case in every bor­der-patrol sec­tor. What needs to hap­pen to make bor­der patrol more ac­count­able? We’ve held com­munity meet­ings and talked with bor­der res­id­ents across many states. We’ve learned what’s work­ing and what’s not.

Here’s what we found. First, bor­der of­ficer train­ing must em­phas­ize “use of force” com­men­sur­ate with the situ­ation. And agents must be cer­ti­fied in the use of less-than-leth­al weapons. This could save lives on the bor­der each year. Next, bor­der-agent train­ing must em­phas­ize de-es­cal­a­tion tech­niques, so that in­cid­ents like rock throw­ing, which of­ten res­ult in the use of leth­al force, can be man­aged more hu­manely. Fi­nally, there must be more in­tern­al su­per­vi­sion and ac­count­ab­il­ity for agents who vi­ol­ate these policies.

These sug­ges­tions won’t trans­form the bor­der re­gion over night, but they are an im­port­ant place to start in restor­ing ba­sic due pro­cess. For­tu­nately, there is grow­ing bi­par­tis­an sup­port for these types of changes. Two mem­bers of Con­gress from bor­der dis­tricts re­cently an­nounced that they are work­ing to­geth­er to ad­dress the is­sues re­vealed in the leaked PERF re­port. Reps. Steve Pearce, R-N.M., and Beto O’Rourke, D-Texas, are in the fi­nal stages of craft­ing a bi­par­tis­an bill that in­cludes many of the solu­tions we’ve ad­voc­ated for and as­pires to cre­ate a bor­der en­force­ment sys­tem that val­ues ac­count­ab­il­ity and over­sight. The bill will be in­tro­duced this week.

As we pre­pare the fight to get it passed in Wash­ing­ton, those of us who live and work at the bor­der will con­tin­ue to chal­lenge the bor­der ste­reo­types and to de­vel­op clear solu­tions to the prob­lems that oc­cur when bor­der-patrol ex­cesses go un­checked.

In the mean­time, we hope these ad­vances will not only make bor­der com­munit­ies even safer but also strengthen the ba­sic pro­tec­tions we all value as Amer­ic­ans.

Fernando Gar­cia is the ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Bor­der Net­work for Hu­man Rights based in El Paso, Texas. Fol­low BNHR on Twit­ter at @bnhr

HAVE AN OPIN­ION ON POLICY AND CHAN­GING DEMO­GRAPH­ICS?

The Next Amer­ica wel­comes op-ed pieces that ex­plore the polit­ic­al, eco­nom­ic, and so­cial ef­fects of the pro­found ra­cial and cul­tur­al changes fa­cing our na­tion, par­tic­u­larly rel­ev­ant to edu­ca­tion, eco­nomy, the work­force and health. Email Jan­ell Ross at jross@na­tion­al­journ­al.com. Please fol­low us on Twit­ter and Face­book.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×