NATIONAL SECURITY

Senate OKs Controversial Detainee Provision, Setting Up Fight With White House

In this January 11, 2002 file photo, U.S. Military Police guard Taliban and al Qaeda detainees in orange jumpsuits in a holding area at Camp X-Ray at Naval Base Guantanamo Bay, Cuba during in-processing to the temporary detention facility.

Updated: November 30, 2011 | 7:45 a.m.
November 29, 2011 | 3:30 p.m.

The Senate soundly defeated a move to strip out controversial language requiring mandatory detention of some terror suspects, voting it down 61 to 37 and escalating a fight with the Obama administration over the future course of the war on terror.

The proposed amendment to the massive National Defense Authorization Act would require the FBI and other civilian law enforcement agencies to transfer al-Qaida suspects arrested overseas on charges of planning or carrying out a terror attack into military custody. It wouldn’t apply to American citizens, but the change has drawn strong opposition from civil rights groups and the White House, which has promised to veto the defense bill if that language was included.

The provision has also split the Democratic Party, triggering an unusual fight between the White House and Armed Services Committee Chairman Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, who co-wrote the measure and took to the floor earlier on Tuesday to defend the amendment. Levin has also found himself in the cross hairs of powerful Democrats like Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein of California. Both lawmakers urged their colleagues to strip the detainee language out of the bill and accused Levin of overstepping his jurisdiction.

But Levin’s biggest Democratic opponent was Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., who sponsored an amendment designed to remove the detainee language.

 

Want to stay ahead of the curve? Sign up for National Journal’s AM & PM Must Reads. News and analysis to ensure you don’t miss a thing.

Leave a Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal's Email Newsletters
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad
Columns
Reid Wilson: On the Trail

Buy Early and Often

9:30 p.m.
With so many candidates, super PACs, and party committees chasing limited TV ad time, the rules of the road have changed. An insider’s guide.
Major Garrett: All Powers

Romney’s Core

May 22, 2012
Can he offer a fulsome defense of his Bain Capital years? Despite this week’s back-and-forth over Cory Booker, some Republicans fear that he can’t.
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

The Emerging Democratic Divide

May 22, 2012
The brouhaha over a moderate New Jersey mayor’s comments has aggravated tensions that have been growing within the party’s coalition.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Not Waiting for the Feds

12:16 p.m.

Latest Response by Ken Orski: The Days of Multi-Year Bills May be Over

Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

11:16 a.m.

Latest Response by Tim Greeff: Advanced Energy Powers Stronger Military

Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

10:47 a.m.

Latest Response by Margo Thorning: Smart Energy Keeps Military Strong

More Expert Opinions »