NATIONAL SECURITY

New York Times: Firefight in bin Laden Compound was One-Sided

Updated: May 5, 2011 | 8:20 a.m.
May 5, 2011 | 7:57 a.m.

(AFP Photo)

New details from the raid that killed Osama bin Laden suggest that the U.S. forces took much less enemy fire than originally suggested by the administration.

The more than 20 Navy SEALs who participated in the operation at the al-Qaida leader's compound in Pakistan only took fire from one man—bin Laden’s courier, Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti—a senior administration official told The New York Times.

Since Sunday night, the administration has repeatedly insisted that bin Laden was killed in a “firefight” as the SEALs worked their way through his house in Abbottabad. Such language has raised questions about the operation, including whether bin Laden was armed (he was not), whether a woman was used as a human shield (the administration now says she was killed in crossfire), and whether the operation was conducted in a lawful manner (the White House insists it was).

National Journal learned Wednesday that bin Laden was in a room with weapons when he was killed, which could support the administration’s claim that he presented a threat to the SEALs and resisted capture.

Any changes in the narrative about the raid are being attributed by press secretary Jay Carney to the administration’s attempt to share as much information as possible. But Carney indicated at Wednesday’s press briefing that the flow of information will slow considerably, as any operational details that have not been disclosed need to be kept secret to protect U.S. forces.

The report from the Times came as Reuters released a set of graphic photographs from the compound displaying the dead bodies of three men, presumed to be al-Kuwaiti, al-Kuwaiti’s brother, and bin Laden’s son Khalid, who were all reportedly shot dead during the raid.

Want the news first every morning? Sign up for National Journal’s Need-to-Know MemoShort items to prepare you for the day.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »