NATIONAL SECURITY

DHS Terminates Virtual Border Fence Program

Updated: January 14, 2011 | 3:02 p.m.
January 14, 2011 | 2:10 p.m.

Border Patrol agent Claudia Chavez-Burt moves a remote-controlled camera near the Rio Grande River at a U.S. Border Patrol headquarters August 7, 2008 in Laredo, Texas. U.S. Border patrol agents in the headquarters constantly monitor the border for illegal crossings, as part of their efforts to stop illegal immigrants, drug traffickers and potential terrorists from crossing illegally into the United States. (Getty Images)

The Department of Homeland Security on Friday officially terminated its long-troubled program to build a virtual fence along the nation’s southern border using surveillance cameras and other technology.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano briefed lawmakers on her decision to kill the so-called SBInet program and put forward a new plan for using technology along the border with Mexico.

The decision is a blow to Boeing, the prime contractor for the program. But the move was not unexpected. Last year, the department halted funding and additional work on the program beyond two test phases in Arizona. About $1 billion in taxpayer funds has been spent on the program to date.

“There is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution to meet our border-technology needs, and this new strategy is tailored to the unique needs of each border region, providing faster deployment of technology, better coverage, and a more effective balance between cost and capability,” Napolitano said.

Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., immediately praised Napolitano’s decision.

“The secretary’s decision to terminate SBInet ends a long-troubled program that spent far too much of the taxpayers’ money for the results it delivered,” Lieberman said. “From the start, SBInet’s one-size-fits-all approach was unrealistic. The department’s decision to use technology based on the particular security needs of each segment of the border is a far wiser approach, and I hope it will be more cost effective.”

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »