July 4, 2009
National Journal MagazineNational Journal MagazineThe HotlineCongress Daily
Buzz Columns
Click here for a print friendly version

National
Journal Group

Learn more about our publications and sign up for a free trial.

E-Mail Alerts
Get notified the moment your favorite features are updated.

Need A Reprint?
Click here for details on reprints, permissions and back issues.

Advertise With Us
Details on advertising with National Journal Group -- both online and in print -- can be found in our online media kit.

Go Wireless
Get daily political updates on your handheld computer.

GovernmentExecutive.com - Covering The Business Of The Federal Government
ON THE TRAIL
Speaker Pelosi?

By Chuck Todd, NationalJournal.com
© National Journal Group Inc.
Wednesday, Sept. 14, 2005

Let's be incredibly irresponsible this week and assume that the bleak picture taking shape for the GOP gets even bleaker come November 2006. To put it another way, if this were September 2006 and not September 2005, there would be a whole lot more doom and gloom coming from the right side of the aisle. The good news for Republicans is that they have 14 months to right their ship. Still, stay with us for a minute.


Democrats fear that the good that comes from somehow winning the House in 2006 brings with it a lot of pain for 2008 in the form of Republicans "Newtifying" Pelosi.



Advertisement Advertisement

It's hard to imagine how the Democrats win either chamber in 2006. No matter the landscape, it's difficult to make the numbers work. But if there is one chamber that we could envision flipping in 2006, it's the House. The Senate appears to be just out of reach.

The Democrats need six pickups to take control. Even being extremely generous with Tennessee, there are just seven GOP-held seats in some peril; and nevermind the three open seats Democrats have to defend (and a few other vulnerable incumbents as well). Bottom line: the Senate's dicey for the Democrats even under the best of circumstances.

The House is another story. Examine the '06 battleground races one-by-one and it's hard to see how the Democrats win this. Between redistricting and the lack of GOP retirements (you've heard this before), it's not easy. But add a decent breeze blowing in the Democrats' direction and suddenly it's hard to rule out 15-20 seats.

And what does that lead us to? Well, our headline of course: the possibility of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

In the last few weeks, particularly post-Katrina, we've been hearing from many a Democrat getting nervous about the prospect of a Speaker Pelosi. As minority leader, many of these Democrats have had little to quibble with Pelosi. Do they wish she performed better on-camera? Yes. But it's not something that keeps these folks up at night. Bottom line: for the Democrats, the fear is that the good that comes from somehow winning the House in 2006 brings with it a lot of pain for 2008 in the form of Republicans "Newtifying" Pelosi.

And what then is the unintended consequence? A big problem for prospective presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.

  • Clinton has two gigantic hurdles to overcome in order to make it to the White House. First, her husband (from what to do with him during the campaign to how to deal with the negatives his name creates to certain "values" voters). The second hurdle is the biggest one of all: her gender.

    Is the country ready for a female commander in chief? It will be a running debate for as long as Clinton is an active presidential candidate. As we've examined in past columns, there are even some Democrats who seem uneasy at the thought of a female president. We've speculated that these are older labor men and senior women, mostly from Midwestern battleground states. Past election results show that Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin and even Michigan have all seen Democratic women underperform normal Democratic performances in statewide bids.

    Now, toss in the dimension of some Republican 527 (or even an actual Republican Party committee) running ads, which create the impression that Pelosi is Clinton's ideological running mate. Remember those "Dole-Gingrich" TV ads the Democratic National Committee dumped on the Republicans in 1996? Then there's the tag line, which goes something like this: "Are we ready to turn the country over to those whose values stem from New York and San Francisco?"

    There will be a number of subtexts that Clinton's GOP foes will hope this (or a similar) ad touches: from tapping into big-city prejudices to political chauvinism when it comes to running the country. This may come across as raw (even chauvinistic on our part), but politics is rough and any election involving a Clinton will be even rougher.

    Can Democrats prevent this stereotyping of Pelosi? Of course. The minority leader needs to embark on a PR tour of sorts with those in the "whisper community" of the Democratic Party, particularly as prospects for a Democratic takeover in the House increase. These are the same folks who talk to a lot of reporters and are intricately involved with a lot of '06 and '08 campaigns. Pelosi must not only ask for outside advice but actually take some of it as well. She's got a reputation (fair or unfair) for being a "my way or the highway" type of leader. She doesn't quite have the political capital within the Democratic Party to lead that way just yet -- maybe in time, but not yet. Pelosi needs to demonstrate that she'll be an asset to the party, and any stereotype folks will attempt to paint on her -- should she become speaker -- will fail to take hold.

    Trail Droppings


    It's been a while since we've dived into a number of happenings around the country:

    • Katrina Moments: As far as 2008 is concerned, there are two Democrats worth keeping an eye on to see if they can gain more traction: former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.

    Timing is everything and Edwards' attempts the past nine months to bring a higher profile to the issue of poverty had previously fallen on some deaf ears. Not anymore. For now, it appears Edwards is trying to walk a fine line and not look like he's attempting to politicize the situation. But one wonders if he ought to do more than just run his poverty center. Perhaps he should create some organization, a la Habitat for Humanity, that doesn't just put out policy papers, but can actually point to private sector accomplishments.

    As for Obama, he has no choice but to increase his national profile. As the only black senator, he owes it to the Katrina victims to become their voice in the Senate. Politically, if Obama doesn't take as high a profile role as he possibly can, he would damage himself, particularly with black political leaders. It was very interesting to note how the Illinois Democrat avoided attacking singer Kanye West on ABC's "This Week" last Sunday, and instead tried to find a middle ground. It's what Obama does best. Before Katrina, he had been keeping his head down trying not to be perceived, like Edwards, as being in a hurry. Katrina has sped up the timetable.

    • Who Lost Virginia: We think we now know how the excuses are going to line up depending on the result of the most politically significant election of 2005. If Democrat Tim Kaine wins Virginia, Republicans can point to a number of factors that will have little to do with their candidate -- Jerry Kilgore. These include Bush's overall unpopularity (both nationally and even in the state), the crisis in confidence Katrina may be causing Republicans in general, Democrat Gov. Mark Warner's enormous popularity and, finally, Republican-turned-independent H. Russell Potts Jr. taking GOP votes in the Shenandoah Valley.

    What does all of this mean for Kaine if he loses? His folks will attempt to blame it on the state, saying it's still Republican, etc. But let's be realistic; every intangible is in Kaine's favor so if he does lose, the blame is going to fall squarely on his shoulders.

    • Things We Think We Know: Texas GOP Gov. Rick Perry is the biggest Katrina "winner."... Ground Zero for Americans who may have lost complete faith in government will be in the Cincinnati (not Louisiana) media market. Between the scandals in Ohio and Kentucky, all those area voters are hearing about state government is that it's crooked. ... The likelihood of Clinton leading the Democratic ticket guarantees that a Republican white male White House nominee has to name a minority or woman as his running mate. ... Republicans contemplating bids for governor (Illinois' Jim Edgar?) and senator (North Dakota's John Hoeven) will end up not running simply out of fear of the national GOP landscape.

    -- Chuck Todd is a NationalJournal.com contributing editor and editor in chief of The Hotline. His e-mail address is ctodd@nationaljournal.com.

    [ On The Trail Archives ]

    Advertisement Advertisement

    Need A Reprint Of This Column?
    National Journal Group offers both print and electronic reprint services, as well as permissions for academic use, photocopying and republication. Click here to order, or call us at 877-394-7350.



 NEW FEATURE

Search



[ E-mail NationalJournal.com ]
[ Site Index | Staff | Privacy Policy | E-Mail Alerts ]
[ Reprints And Back Issues | Content Licensing ]
[ Make NationalJournal.com Your Homepage ]
[ About National Journal Group Inc. ]
[ Employment Opportunities ]

Copyright 2009 by National Journal Group Inc.
The Watergate · 600 New Hampshire Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20037
202-739-8400 · fax 202-833-8069
NationalJournal.com is an Atlantic Media publication.