Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Congressional Insiders Poll Congressional Insiders Poll

This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Magazine / CONGRESSIONAL INSIDERS POLL

Congressional Insiders Poll

April 19, 2012

Should congressional leadership take sides or spend money in a member-versus-member primary?

Democrats (22 Votes)

Yes: 18%
No: 77%
Other (volunteered): 5%

Yes

 

“They should be involved in member-to-member primaries if they feel it is important to their party.”

“Who knows the members better? For example: the Berman/Sherman race in California. [Howard] Berman is a statesman, [Brad] Sherman is a pretender.”

No

“Probably not, since you are supposed to be the leader of the ENTIRE caucus or conference…. Who could really be surprised by another self-serving move by [House Majority Leader] Eric Cantor?”

“Absolutely not; but in modern-day D.C., there is no reward for team play and no payback for lack of same, so it won’t matter—one more step down the ‘we are all on our own’ road.”

“It’s not leadership’s role to pick the members; it’s the members’ job to pick the leaders, unless it is a ‘problem’ member like Jim Traficant or Bill Jefferson.”

“[It’s a] highly destructive act. It will derail Cantor sooner or later.”

“It fosters better working relationships if leadership stays out of these races.”

Other

“It depends. But supporting a super PAC that indiscriminately targets long-serving members is outrageous by any standard.”

 

Should congressional leadership take sides or spend money in a member-versus-member primary?

Republicans (21 Votes)

Yes: 24%      
No: 68%
Other (volunteered): 9%

Yes

“It is courageous to do so, and this town needs a lot more courage. I vote yes.”

“Occasionally it may be necessary, building a strong team for the long term is important.”

“On the rare occasion when member-member races occur, backing the more conservative candidate is for the good of the party.”

“It has serious consequences for leadership, but they certainly have the right to do what’s necessary to shape the majority.”

“Outside groups are taking sides and spending lots of money in member-versus-member primaries. Why should leadership let outside special-interest groups dictate who will be part of their caucus?”

No

“It’s not good for party unity!”

“Leaders should always stay clear of member-versus-member races. Cantor’s failure to do so is the biggest miscalculation of his congressional career. His enemies will use it against him for years to come. Indeed, they already are.”

“It certainly does not make the whip’s job any easier.”

Other

“[It] depends on circumstances.”

“Leadership or leadership-to-be always takes sides, most especially in fundraising assistance. The question here is: Will Republican leaders support conservatives like they claim to be, or will their goal be maintaining power? That’s what I thought—power triumphs conservative beliefs. My point is, it doesn’t matter. They always have and always will.”

 

How excited are you that Mitt Romney is the presumptive Republican presidential nominee?

Democrats (22 Votes)

Very excited: 14%
Somewhat excited: 14%
Apathetic: 68%
Other (volunteered): 5%

Very excited

“He is a wooden, out-of-touch, rich guy who will not appeal to regular Americans. Obama has lucked out!”

“No one could be more out of touch.”

Somewhat excited

“I am excited mostly because Rick Santorum and friends did such a good job of pushing him to the right.”

Apathetic

“He looks and acts like he was put together by a committee!”

“It doesn’t look like we will get much debate or discussion about the big issues facing the country. A lot of right-wing rhetoric.”

“No principles, no core. Nothing to even get angry about.”

“Flip-flopper in chief.”

“Blah.”

 

How excited are you that Mitt Romney is the presumptive Republican presidential nominee?

Republicans (20 Votes)

Very excited: 65%
Somewhat excited: 30%
Apathetic: 5%

Very excited

“It takes a nominee to beat a nominee, and America needs a new president so we can create jobs, cut spending, and reduce gas prices.”

“Barack Obama has failed to meet his own criteria for reelection, and Mitt Romney is ready to lead on Day One.”

“Compared to the prospect of four more years of failed leadership from President Obama, as a strong conservative I am very excited about a Romney White House.”

“He’s got the background and experience to challenge and succeed against Obama on the issue that matters most: jobs.”

“His executive leadership experience is what our country needs.”

“Most excited that I don’t have to hear from Santorum for at least three more years.”

“He has the best résumé of any of the candidates, including Obama, for doing the job of president.”

Somewhat excited

“It’s all about President Obama.”

“The motivation is to remove Obama.”

“Frankly, Republicans are excited about beating Obama,not electing Romney or any of the other candidates. The best Republican candidates simply didn’t run.”

“I think he will pleasantly surprise conservatives after he surprises Obama this fall.”

“Romney can win. He’ll need to catch some breaks, but he can win.”

_____________

Democratic Congressional Insiders Sens. Sherrod Brown, Ben Cardin, Thomas Carper, Christopher A. Coons, Mark Pryor, Tom Udall; Reps. Jason Altmire, Robert Andrews, Tammy Baldwin, Karen Bass, Xavier Becerra, Howard Berman, Lois Capps, Michael Capuano, Dennis Cardoza, James Clyburn, Gerry Connolly, Joseph Crowley, Diana DeGette, Rosa DeLauro, Elliot Engel, Anna Eshoo, Sam Farr, Chaka Fattah, Bob Filner, Rush Holt, Mike Honda, Marcy Kaptur, Jim Langevin, John Lewis, Zoe Lofgren, Ed Markey, Jim McGovern, Jim Moran, Gary Peters, Collin Peterson, David Price, Linda Sanchez, Kurt Schrader, Allyson Schwartz, Jose Serrano, Bennie Thompson, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Henry Waxman, Peter Welch, and Frederica Wilson.

GOP Congressional Insiders Sens. Johnny Isakson, Richard Lugar, David Vitter; Reps. John Boehner, Charles Boustany, Kevin Brady, John Campbell, Eric Cantor, John Carter, Tom Cole, Mike Conaway, Jeff Denham, David Dreier, Sean Duffy, Jo Ann Emerson, Jeff Flake, Scott Garrett, Bob Goodlatte, Trey Gowdy, Kay Granger, Doc Hastings, Nan Hayworth, Tim Huelskamp, Mike Kelly, Peter King, Jack Kingston, Adam Kinzinger, John Kline, Dan Lungren, Kenny Marchant, Kevin McCarthy, Patrick McHenry, Candice Miller, Sue Myrick, Devin Nunes, Tom Price, Dave Reichert, Reed Ribble, Phil Roe, Paul Ryan, Aaron Schock, David Schweikert, Austin Scott, Adrian Smith, Steve Stivers, Lee Terry, Pat Tiberi, Fred Upton, Daniel Webster, and Joe Wilson.

Job Board
Search Jobs
Transportation Planner
American Society of Civil Engineers | Salinas, CA
Biomedical Service Internship Position
American Society of Civil Engineers | Flint, MI
Fire Sprinkler Inspector
American Society of Civil Engineers | Charlotte, NC
Deputy Director of Transit Operations
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Jose, CA
Structural Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | New Haven, CT
Assessment and Remediation Team Lead
American Society of Civil Engineers | Regina, SK
Professional Development Program Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Farmington Hills, MI
Assistant Professor - Water Resources/Ecological Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Auburn, AL
Quality Systems Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers | Greensboro, NC
Rail Field Construction Inspector
American Society of Civil Engineers | Jacksonville, FL
Manager, Quality Assurance
American Society of Civil Engineers | Memphis, TN
Sr. Controls Systems Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Grand Island, NE
Quality Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Attica, IN
Civil Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Steamboat Springs, CO
Commissioning Intern
American Society of Civil Engineers | Chicago, IL
 
Comments
comments powered by Disqus