COVER STORY

Disparate Impact

A disproportionate share of ethics cases have been brought against members of the Congressional Black Caucus. African-American lawmakers would like to know why.

Updated: March 13, 2012 | 5:22 p.m.
March 1, 2012 | 2:00 p.m.

Cornered: Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., who faces a House ethics probe, addresses reporters in August 2011. (Chet Susslin)

All told, investigators probed six black members for two different island jaunts. All but one were ultimately cleared of knowingly receiving a corporate-paid trip. The exception was Rangel, whose staff was proven to have known that corporations were footing the bill; he was admonished.

Flaherty, who served as chairman of Citizens for Reagan in the 1980s, said that House ethics investigators would not have been aware of the trip if not for his efforts. “The only way an outside group like our own can get any traction is if you get it out into the media bloodstream, and then the Ethics Committee can’t ignore them,” he said.

The National Legal and Policy Center has proved particularly adept at using the media echo chamber, especially through its almost symbiotic relationship with the New York Post. The group pushed portions of the Rangel probe that led to his censure (including dispatching a Spanish-speaking sleuth to the Dominican Republic to investigate his property there). More recently, the center has been digging into Meeks’s finances. Flaherty openly bragged about placing pieces critical of Meeks in The New York Times, the New York Post, and the New York Daily News.

“They know how this game is played,” Meeks said in an interview, predicting his eventual full exoneration. “They know what they’re doing, and they manipulate it to the fullest extent.” He emphasized that “a disproportionate number” of the center’s recent targets—those on the Caribbean trip, Rangel, himself and, before that, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson Sr.—are black.

Flaherty defended his track record, saying that the misdeeds he uncovers are real. “We’ve hit plenty of white crooks,” he added, naming past reports on former Rep. Alan Mollohan and Pelosi, both Democrats.

Other groups have effectively used the media to pressure the formal ethics watchdogs, including Sloan’s organization (which asked for a probe into Richardson last summer, releasing a file of internal staff e-mails about performing errands and campaign work for the lawmaker) and Judicial Watch (a conservative group behind the sexual-harassment lawsuit against Hastings that evolved into an ethics case).

Flaherty makes no apologies for his role. “They really are influenced by the forces around them,” he said of congressional ethics officials. “Left to their own devices, they’d probably do nothing.”

BALANCING THE SCALES

It’s important to note that white lawmakers on the Hill have not escaped scrutiny.

The Ethics Committee is currently examining Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., for omitting information from financial disclosure forms. In December, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee referred the names of four lawmakers (three white, one black) to the Ethics Committee for allegedly receiving favorable loans from mortgage lender Countrywide. The Ethics panel has issued no word about a formal probe.

Meanwhile, freshman Rep. Michael Grimm, R-N.Y., a former FBI agent, faces a budding scandal after a New York Times exposé about improper campaign contributions spurred calls for inquiries by the Ethics Committee and the Justice Department. Other white lawmakers who have come under scrutiny in recent years—notably, ex-Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., and ex-Reps. Eric Massa and Anthony Weiner, both D-N.Y.—have resigned rather than face an ethics investigation. More cases are in the pipeline. Records show that the Ethics Committee had dozens of unnamed, active cases at the end of 2011 and that the Office of Congressional Ethics had undertaken eight preliminary inquiries in the fourth quarter of 2011.Only one name has surfaced, that of Rep. Spencer Bachus, a white Alabama Republican, who is under investigation for insider stock trading.

The new cases may begin to balance the scales, but for African-Americans lawmakers such as Cleaver, the palpable sense of mistreatment lingers.

“It makes,” Cleaver said, “for an uncomfortable feeling as you walk these halls.”

This article appears in the March 3, 2012, edition of National Journal.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Printable Edition
Click here for a printable edition of this week's magazine.
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

No Wonder Republican Criticism of Obama Isn’t Working

May 23, 2013
They’re attacking the president where he’s least vulnerable at a time when they have minimal credibility.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Smaller Schools Aren’t Always Better

May 23, 2013
The universities best able to expand access to education are the ones with the most students.
Reid Wilson: On the Trail

Parties Push For House Retirements

May 23, 2013
Campaign committees utilize scare tactics to pressure members to step aside.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

10:52 p.m.

Latest Response by Brigham McCown: Hold Your Horses

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

11:44 a.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: A Breath of Fresh Air

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

May 24, 2013

Latest Response by Brigham McCown: U.S. Lacks Coherent LNG Policy

More Expert Opinions »