| Left-leaning (16 votes) | Right-leaning (13 votes) |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Yes "It's a tentative yes at this point. I just wish he'd forced the banks to do the same thing. They are just as insolvent as GM and everyone knows it." Sean-Paul Kelley, The Agonist "Ideology be damned, will it work? That's all Americans care about. And the alternative was..." Greg Dworkin, Daily Kos "Bankruptcy is a scary word, but if managed correctly it is an orderly process. I have been saying for months that a managed bankruptcy might be the best solution for GM." David Kravitz, Blue Mass. Group "Preventing liquidation and job losses that will affect communities and the economy makes it worth a try. We do need to rethink our policy of shipping manufacturing jobs overseas, and with GM's bankruptcy, I fear Obama is committing us to more of the same. Obama needs to commit to protecting skilled industrial workers and their industries through modernization so we can continue to compete internationally. We need a manufacturing base in this country -- to think otherwise is short-sighted." Tracy Viselli, Reno And Its Discontents "I assume the question is actually about whether the U.S. should bail out GM. Bankruptcy was inevitable, whether it was a liquidation of GM (if no government intervention) or an attempt to save it (with government help). Given the state of the economy, this was a no-brainer." Big Tent Democrat, TalkLeft "I don't see that he had a choice. I just wish he'd done the same thing with AIG." Barbara O'Brien, The Mahablog "I only wish he'd taken this 'tough love' approach with the banking industry!" Susie Madrak, Suburban Guerrilla "What was the alternative?" Mark Kleiman, The Reality-Based Community |
Yes "Finally." Martin Solomon, Solomonia "Bankruptcy seems preferable to perpetual bailouts of a zombie auto company. That distinction would be erased, though, if the bankruptcy process becomes a political power grab." Jon Henke, The Next Right "Even better would have been bankruptcy according to established legal rules, rather than the Peron-style expropriation of money from the senior bondholders for the benefit of the UAW." David Kopel, The Volokh Conspiracy "My only complaint is that it took so long for GM to get there. GM is a business, and should have gone into bankruptcy immediately, without first sucking vast sums out of the taxpayers and transferring its wealth to the unions." Bookworm, Bookworm Room "It should have gone bankrupt years, nay, decades ago." Michael van der Galien, PoliGazette No "While I agree with the bankruptcy option, I think the government should have stayed out and let the normal procedure drive the process. What's the difference between nationalizing a business in Venezuela versus doing it in America?" Doug Lambert, GraniteGrok "It should have made the walk on its own." Walter Olson, Overlawyered "The government should not be involved." D.S. Hube, The Colossus Of Rhodey "General Motors could have gone to bankruptcy court on their own. Of course, that would have meant a serious reduction in the UAW's labor contracts, and Obama just couldn't let his political supporters suffer like that. So we have extra-special, government-guided bankruptcy instead. Which is just like normal bankruptcy, except manipulated to benefit the president and his cronies." Rob Port, Say Anything "I'm against the federal government taking over any privately owned businesses. GM should have been allowed to fail, to take bankruptcy before the government bailouts, which did nothing but delay the inevitable." Debbie Hamilton, Right Truth "I wish he would make up his mind. First President Obama said GM was too big to fail, so pour billions of dollars to prop it up, and now he has allowed them to go bankrupt, thus pissing all our money away. Oh well, I guess as long as the union boss didn't lose any weight over it, all is well." Bob Parks, Black And Right |
| Left-leaning (16 votes) | Right-leaning (12 votes) | ||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Major benefit "Politically speaking, Obama has locked up 70-75 percent of the Latino vote for Democrats for the next decade, in large part because of the behavior of Republican leaders like Rush, Newt and Tancredo." Big Tent Democrat, TalkLeft "She will be a piece of a strategy in restoring a balance on the court that doesn't trample on the rights and aspirations of 'just plain folks' for the sake of corporate priorities. If Obama can achieve that for the country, he will help the Democratic Party in the long run." Howie Klein, Down With Tyranny! "Sotomayor's successful nomination, in spite of ridiculously sexist and racist rhetoric from Republican pundits, will be a boost for the Democrats. Adding another eminently qualified, centrist justice will also be a boon. Unfortunately, I think the problems caused by the recent disconnect between Republican lawmakers and pundits on the nomination are finally sinking in with lawmakers. I hope it doesn't happen, but they seem to be at least thinking about throwing off the yoke Limbaugh has had around their necks." Tracy Viselli, Reno And Its Discontents "The Republicans can't win on this issue, and they are already showing they can lose... lose Latinos, lose women, lose votes." Greg Dworkin, Daily Kos "A woman and the first Hispanic on the Supreme Court? How can it not be a huge benefit? It only alienates those who were already alienated." Lee Papa, The Rude Pundit "Can you say 'wedge issue'? Why bother killing your opponents when you can induce them to commit suicide? The nature of the far right's reaction was predictable, though its full, insane fury wasn't. The failure of the institutional GOP and its elected officials to distance themselves from the frank racism of the anti-Sotomayor campaign (e.g., Liddy referring to Spanish as 'illegal alien') may do for Latinos nationwide what 'They... keep... coming' did for Latinos in California: move them semi-permanently into the Democratic camp." Mark Kleiman, The Reality-Based Community "Republicans look pretty bad right now. Latino voters are looking at their response and saying, 'What exactly does one of us have to do before you won't accuse us of being unqualified?'" Susie Madrak, Suburban Guerrilla "I'm confident she will be a good justice. Conservatives' attacks against her just make them look petty and ridiculous." Barbara O'Brien, The Mahablog "Republicans are really damaging themselves with their racially charged attacks on Sotomayor. This will have long-lasting, negative implications for their vote percentage among Latinos." Chris Bowers, Open Left Minor benefit "Sotomayor will most likely be easily confirmed, and if the Democrats manage the process well, they'll come out looking good. But Supreme Court nominations don't generally translate into huge political pay dirt, so I don't see 'major benefit.'" David Kravitz, Blue Mass. Group Minor harm "There are simply too many Catholic jurists on the Supreme Court. And I come from a Catholic family. I don't see her moving the court to the left. It will remain center-right." Sean-Paul Kelley, The Agonist |
Major benefit "Sonia Sotomayor has said, in the comfort of the like-minded La Raza and her college audience, that she believes Latinos are better than whites, and advocating from the bench is a joke. Sonia Sotomayor will be a poster child." Bob Parks, Black And Right Minor benefit "Though the political makeup of the high court will essentially remain unaffected, the GOP will get a little traction out of showing Barack Obama's true feelings regarding racial preferences and gun control." D.S. Hube, The Colossus Of Rhodey "Only 45 percent want her confirmed. That number will decrease in coming days and weeks, so Republicans will benefit from it. But only a little bit." Michael van der Galien, PoliGazette "They'll beat Obama up on the nomination a bit, but ultimately she'll get seated." Rob Port, Say Anything Minor harm "I don't have a great deal of confidence that Republican politicians will cover themselves in intellectual glory, or that many prominent Republican voices will come out of this appearing reasonable and persuasive to the people they need to persuade." Jon Henke, The Next Right "Her actual rulings don't bear out the 'scary radical' meme. That Senate Dems were equally unfair to Miguel Estrada will, along with $3.26, buy you a latte at Starbucks." Walter Olson, Overlawyered "As a Democrat, I think it will help the party by mollifying some of the Hispanics who will be upset by Obama's inability to pass an amnesty program for illegal aliens. The nomination may also benefit Republicans, if Republican senators raise serious objections about some of Sotomayor's unpopular and legal weak decisions, such as Ricci, Maloney and Village of Port Chester." David Kopel, The Volokh Conspiracy "We knew that Obama would have the opportunity to appoint at least one Supreme Court justice, and the more I know about Sotomayor, the less worried I am about her appointment. I'm getting the feeling that she's an intellectual lightweight. We're therefore getting a younger version of Souter who won't make any intellectual waves on the court." Bookworm, Bookworm Room "Given the Repubs are in the minority, there isn't much they can really do. There is enough questionable material about her that they can bring it out without much damage... or, sadly, effect." Doug Lambert, GraniteGrok Major harm "Sonia Sotomayor on the Supreme Court is not good for this country, therefore I do not believe she is good for my party. This should not be a party vs. party situation, this should be what is best for the United States. Ms. Sotomayor has not proven that she is a competent judge, looking at her past rulings. She simply is not the best person for the job." Debbie Hamilton, Right Truth |