CAMPAIGN LAW

FEC Asks Crossroads to Reveal Donors

Updated: June 16, 2011 | 9:18 p.m.
June 16, 2011 | 6:58 p.m.

Karl Rove, may not be smiling over the FEC's request that a political group he founded give up its donor list. (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

The FEC this week sent a letter demanding Crossroads GPS, the Karl Rove-backed nonprofit that pumped millions of dollars in anonymous donations into last year's Congressional campaigns, disclose its contributors. The request appears unlikely to be honored but it could signal an effort to tighten regulations on controversial third-party groups.

On Tuesday, the FEC sent two letters, each from Senior Campaign Finance Analyst Christopher Whyrick, asking Crossroads to amend campaign expenditure reports to include information about the donors who funded its political ads. One letter referred to the group’s October’s quarterly disclosure form, the other to its year-end report.

From National Journal:
PICTURES: Meet the GOP Presidential Hopefuls


How Republican Governors Could Define the 2012 Race

White House Argues U.S. Isn't Really at War in Libya

PICTURES: Lawmakers Attend White House Picnic

VIDEO: The Economy & 2012: Obama's Only Hope

“Commission regulations require that you disclose identification information for each individual who made a donation used to fund the independent expenditure,” the letter reads, quoting FEC regulations. “Please amend the report to provide the missing information.”

The letter says Crossroads must respond by July 19, with no extension possible.

On its face, the letters amount to an incendiary request. Crossroads GPS, along with an array of other non-profit 501(c)4 groups, were a major force during the 2010 elections in part because of their ability to keep donors secret. The groups, most of which backed conservatives, were highly controversial for Democrats, and President Obama frequently criticized them while campaigning. But Democrats have subsequently created their own counterpart organizations for next year's campaign.

A Crossroads spokesman and campaign-finance watchdogs alike agree that the FEC request is easily sidestepped. It applies only to contributions that were specifically earmarked for independent expenditures. Donations to Crossroads, group spokesman Jonathan Collegio told National Journal, were never earmarked that way.

"This is a routine request for additional information by the FEC's Reports Analysis Division,” he said. “Crossroads GPS will provide an adequate response in the appropriate time, saying essentially that its reports were full and complete, and that there are no donors to report because no contributions were earmarked for any particular electioneering communication or independent expenditure.”

His assessment was shared by Paul Ryan, an attorney for the Campaign Legal Center, a group that aims to reduce the influence of money in politics. Nearly all the money Crossroads collects is funneled toward political advertisements, Ryan said, but the group isn’t required to disclose donors unless they specifically earmark their donation for the political ads, making disclosure easily avoidable.

The fact Crossroads can easily fend off the FEC’s request is a testament to just how broken campaign-finance laws are, Ryan added. “What you’re looking at is a perfect illustration of how disclosure laws aren’t working today,” he said.

Even so, the letter serves notice that the plethora of nonprofit groups that sprang up following the Supreme Court's landmark Citizens United ruling are under greater scrutiny from campaign-finance regulators. The FEC's letter follows a notice earlier this year that the IRS may seek back payment of gift taxes from donors to several nonprofit groups. While the groups involved in the letters were never identified, conservative attorneys read the move as a sign the feds might start cracking down on political organizations.

In addition, President Obama has been considering an executive order mandating that all federal contractors disclose their political donations. 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Mobile Applications
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

3:11 p.m.

Latest Response by Michael Canes: Economics And Politics of Gas Exports

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

2:36 p.m.

Latest Response by Marlo Lewis: Central Planning: Bad Export Policy

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

1:30 p.m.

Latest Response by Jennifer Morgan: US Natural Gas Exports and Climate Risks

More Expert Opinions »