Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Reveal Navigation

U.S. District Judge Tosses Religious Challenge to Health Care Law U.S. District Judge Tosses Religious Challenge to Health Care Law U.S. District Judge Tosses Religious Challenge to Health Care Law U.S. District Judge Tosse...

share
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Health Care / HEALTH CARE

U.S. District Judge Tosses Religious Challenge to Health Care Law

The suit argued the health care law violated the religious freedom of those not wanting to purchase insurance.

An illustration of health forms under a stethoscope and a pen. Health care, doctor, hospital patient,(iStockphoto)

February 22, 2011

A federal judge threw out a lawsuit on Tuesday that argued the health care reform law's insurance coverage mandate violates the religious freedom of those who rely on God to protect them, the Associated Press reports.

U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler in Washington, D.C., dismissed the suit that was filed by the American Center for Law and Justice, the group founded by conservative evangelist Pat Robertson. The suit was filed on behalf of five Americans who have declined to buy health insurance even though they can afford it.

The plaintiffs' suit argued that the coverage mandate violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993.

 

Kessler, appointed to the court by former President Clinton, ruled that Congress can regulate health care spending under the Commerce Clause, and said that anyone who objects to the mandate can pay the penalty for not buying coverage.

"We welcome this ruling, which marks the third time a court has reviewed the Affordable Care Act on the merits and upheld it as constitutional," said Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler, according to the AP. "This court found—as two others have previously—that the minimum coverage provision of the statute was a reasonable measure for Congress to take in reforming our health care system."

You May Find These of Interest
Get us in your feed.
Job Board
Search Jobs
Watershed Resources Specialist
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Francisco, CA
Project Manager II
American Society of Civil Engineers | Memphis, TN
Manager of Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Berkeley, CA
Mechanical Engineer - Dallas, TX
American Society of Civil Engineers | Dallas, TX
SENIOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER / ENGINEERING PRODUCTION MANAGER
American Society of Civil Engineers | Boulder, CO
Senior GCP Auditor
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Francisco, CA
Structural Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Orlando, FL
Construction Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Chicago, IL
Concrete Testing Technician & Special Inspectors
American Society of Civil Engineers | New York, NY
SharePoint Specialist - Englewood, CO
American Society of Civil Engineers | Englewood, CO
Construction Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Cleveland, OH
Rail Vehicle Mechanical Engineer - Elmira, NY
American Society of Civil Engineers | Philadelphia, PA
Structural Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Chicago, IL
Engineering Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers | Springfield, VA
 
Comments
comments powered by Disqus