HEALTH CARE

Supreme Court Saves Health Reform Law

Updated: May 29, 2013 | 10:08 p.m.
June 28, 2012 | 12:21 p.m.

The Supreme Court upheld the health reform law on Thursday (Chet Susslin)

The Supreme Court upheld the health care reform law on Thursday in a ruling in which conservative Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the liberal wing and spelled out ways to keep the highly controversial law within the bounds of the constitution. The ruling vindicates President Obama’s signature domestic policy initiative, even if it doesn’t stop the political debate over the sweeping Affordable Care Act.

The 5-4 ruling lets stand the mandate – the requirement that just about everyone carry health insurance or pay a fine. But the ruling calls the fine a tax, allowing the law to escape arguments that it violates the Commerce Clause of the constitution.

And the ruling, written by Roberts himself, also addresses the law’s controversial requirement that states expand Medicaid coverage to millions of more people. It says the federal government may ask the state to do so and can even pony up the cash, but it cannot withhold its share of Medicaid funds to coerce them to do it.

"Nothing in our opinion precludes Congress from offering funds under the ACA  to expand the availability of health care, and requiring that states accepting such funds comply with the conditions on their use,” the ruling reads. “What Congress is not free to do is to penalize States that choose not to participate in that new program by taking away their existing Medicaid funding."

Not all the justices were convimced. "In our view, the entire Act before us is invalid in its entirety,” conservative justice Anthony Kennedy writes in his dissent.

“Today’s Supreme Court ruling is a clear, unambiguous, and complete victory for long-overdue health care reform. It sends an unmistakable message that the building of a better, fairer health care system will continue to move forward,” Ron Pollack, executive director of the pro-health reform group  Families USA, said in a statement.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

1:57 p.m.
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

June 17, 2013
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Why We Lack Good Privacy Guidelines

June 13, 2013
Technology innovations have served to strip away privacy. They could also be the key to restoring it.
More Columns »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.