HEALTH CARE

Study: Privately Insured Kids Get More Care In ED

Updated: May 11, 2012 | 11:30 a.m.
May 11, 2012 | 11:28 a.m.

Emergency departments are required to treat everyone who comes through the doors, but that doesn’t mean they treat everyone the same way.

Insurance coverage may play a major role in the kind of care a young patient receives, according to a study published in the most recent edition of The Journal of Pediatrics.

Children with public insurance (Medicaid or CHIP) or who had no coverage are at least 22 percent less likely than those with private insurance to receive testing or to undergo procedures when they visit the hospital emergency departments, researchers from Children’s Hospital Boston found.  In addition, children with no insurance are less likely to receive any medication than children with public or private insurance.

That disparity did not hold true for kids diagnosed with a significant illness, who had the same odds of being admitted to the hospital regardless of insurance status.

The study is based on an analysis of emergency department visits recorded in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 1999-2008.  The survey collects data on approximately 33,000 visits annually.

It’s not clear whether the results indicate that ERs are skimping on care for uninsured and publicly insured kids, or perhaps overtreating kids with private insurance coverage, which tends to pay hospitals more. In a press release, lead study author Dr. Rebekah Mannix notes that “because ED physicians are salaried or paid by the hour, it is uncertain how or why a child’s insurance status could be associated with care decisions in the ED.”

The study authors posit several other possible explanations.

Children with private insurance are 11 times more likely than uninsured children, and three times more likely than those with public insurance, to have a primary care doctor, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.  That means privately insured kids are more likely to have been referred to the ER by their doctor, with instructions for a specific workup, including extra tests and procedures.  And they’re less likely to seek out non-emergency care in the ER.

It’s also possible that patients and parents with fewer resources also request less testing and treatment because of financial concerns, the authors suggest.

Almost half of all children do not have private insurance, according to government data.

This story was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit, nonpartisan health policy research and communications organization not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.