HEALTH CARE

Senate Passes Autism Bill

Updated: May 29, 2013 | 8:21 p.m.
September 27, 2011 | 10:46 a.m.

A bill to reauthorize autism-related research and screening programs passed the Senate on Monday night by unanimous consent, ending concerns that programs might expire at the end of the month.

Under the legislation, the package is authorized to continue for three years. Money to pay for the programs has yet to be approved, but legislators have asked for $693 million. President Obama has said he will sign the bill.

The autism legislation was uncontroversial and had sponsors from both parties in both the House and the Senate, but it hit a few roadblocks. On the House side, it stalled for months before suddenly passing on suspension last week without ever going through committee. In the Senate, it appeared set to pass until Sens. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Jim DeMint, R-S.C., raised objections on the floor last week about the bill, and about the larger issue of whether legislative action is the right way for the country to set research priorities.

Those concerns have apparently been resolved. According to Peter Bell, the executive vice president of programs and services for the advocacy group Autism Speaks, three objecting senators released their hold on the bill after its sponsor, Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., agreed to ask the General Accountability Office to investigate how money in the program is being spent.

“We are very supportive of that,” Bell said. “We have always been for the utmost accountability for the funds that are being spent.”

Extensions of the program were also part of this week’s continuing resolution legislation. But autism advocates were concerned that the expiration of the programs could be problematic even if that bill passed. They lobbied legislators intensively and encouraged families of children with developmental disabilities and the clinicians who treat them to reach out to members of Congress. 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

1:57 p.m.
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

June 17, 2013
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Why We Lack Good Privacy Guidelines

June 13, 2013
Technology innovations have served to strip away privacy. They could also be the key to restoring it.
More Columns »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.