HEALTH CARE

Senate Democrats Push Back on Indiana Abortion Law

Updated: May 26, 2011 | 4:49 p.m.
May 26, 2011 | 3:59 p.m.

Senate Democrats pushed back against states trying to keep federal money from reaching abortion providers on Thursday, asking the government to notify state Medicaid programs that there will be penalties for withholding funds.

Gov. Mitch Daniels, R-Ind., signed a law earlier this month to cut off federal funding from Indiana clinics that perform abortions. The law is primarily aimed at the state’s Planned Parenthood clinics, which get federal family-planning grants to administer non-abortion services.

The federal dollars are not allowed to be used for abortions, but supporters of the restrictions argue that any federal funding to Planned Parenthood indirectly supports abortion services.

“We respectfully request that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issue guidance to state Medicaid directors clarifying that taking action to exclude family planning clinics that provide abortion services from Medicaid participation, such as Planned Parenthood, will lead to compliance actions,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., wrote in a letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. Another 29 Senate Democrats signed the letter.

Federal penalties could be a steep price to pay for many states. The federal government pays, on average, half of each state’s Medicaid costs. In Indiana, the federal government is estimated to shoulder more than 66 percent of Medicaid costs.

The senators said the Indiana law would keep Medicaid enrollees from getting all available care, which violates the program’s promise. “The restrictions threatened by state legislatures blatantly contradict the spirit and letter of well-established and long-accepted law,” said the letter.

“We write not to ask support for new law, but for vigorous, prompt enforcement of existing law.”

Want the news first every morning? Sign up for National Journal’s Need-to-Know MemoShort items to prepare you for the day.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles
Columns
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama’s Second-Term G-8 Dance Card: Judo With Putin, Trade, and Syria

June 18, 2013
The president returns to Berlin five years later less the rock star and more the battle-hardened pragmatist.
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

June 18, 2013
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

June 17, 2013
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
More Columns »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.