HEALTH CARE

Judge Blocks FDA's Graphic Cigarette Warning Labels

Updated: November 7, 2011 | 2:52 p.m.
November 7, 2011 | 1:34 p.m.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration purposes new warning labels for packages of cigarettes. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration)

A federal judge blocked a U.S. rule requiring tobacco companies to display graphic images on packs of cigarettes on Monday, saying cigarette companies were likely to win their argument that the law violates free speech rights, Reuters reported.

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon sided with tobacco companies in their fight against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s requirement that cigarette packs carry the images, which include pictures of diseased mouths and a person smoking through a tracheostomy tube in the neck.

In June, FDA introduced nine new warning labels that would take up the top half of the front and back of the packs. Warning labels would also cover at least 20 percent of cigarette ads.

In August, four of the five largest tobacco companies filed suit, saying that the warning labels violate their right to free speech because the labels don't allow people to make their own decisions on whether to smoke. The government anti-smoking labels are more prominent on the packages than the brand name, the companies argued.

“Today’s ruling by a federal judge blocking the implementation of new graphic cigarette warning labels is bad for public health. The ruling in a lawsuit the tobacco industry filed against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is a victory for Big Tobacco in its effort to delay the implementation of the new graphic warning labels," Christopher Hansen, president of the American Cancer Society's lobbying arm, the Cancer Action Network, said in a statement.

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.