HEALTH CARE

GOP Field Loses Vocal Opponent of Health Care Reform

Updated: January 4, 2012 | 1:33 p.m.
January 4, 2012 | 12:50 p.m.
Chet Susslin

Rep. Michele Bachmann made repeal of the 2010 health care reform law the central plank of her platform.

The Republican presidential field has just lost one of its most vocal critics of health care reform. Rep. Michele Bachmann, a fiery conservative aligned with the tea party movement, didn’t just criticize health care reform legislation; she based her campaign on repealing it.

"The evening that 'Obamacare' was passed ... served as the inspiration for my run for the presidency of the United States,” the Minnesota lawmaker told supporters on Wednesday, as she announced the suspension of her campaign.

“What the Congress had done and what President Obama had done in passing Obamacare endangered the very survival of the United States of America,” she said. “I will continue fighting to defeat the president’s agenda of socialism.”

The Republican field is essentially united in opposition to 2010's health reform bill. But Bachmann’s opposition was by far the most passionate, consistent, and sustained. In speech after speech, debate after debate, she repeated two refrains: Repeal Obamacare, and make Barack Obama a one-term president. Bachmann zeroed in on health care reform and financial-regulation legislation -- the 2010 health reform law and Dodd-Frank, respectively -- describing both as examples of creeping socialism, and arguing that both must be repealed as soon as possible.

Bachmann has also been a vocal critic of the health care reform plan fellow contender Mitt Romney championed while governor of Massachusetts.

"We also know that Mitt Romney is the only governor in the history of the United States to put into place socialized medicine," she told National Journal last month. "Mitt Romney will never get rid of the health care mandate under Obamacare."

Want to stay ahead of the curve? Sign up for National Journal’s AM & PM Must Reads. News and analysis to ensure you don’t miss a thing.

Join the Discussion
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal's Email Newsletters
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad
SEARCH THE ARCHIVES
COLUMNS
Reid Wilson: On the Trail

The New Democratic Litmus Test

February 18, 2012
Obama likely will be the last Democrat to win party's presidential nomination without backing same-sex marriage.
Gwen Ifill: Gwen's Take

Black History or American History: What’s the Difference?

February 16, 2012

I’ve often wondered what it meant that the month we set aside to take special note of African-American achievement is the one that’s usually only 28 days long.

Charlie Cook: Charlie Cook's The Cook Report

Risky Business

February 16, 2012
Don’t be fooled into thinking that today’s events will turn November’s election. A lot of time remains.
More Columns »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.