HEALTH CARE

Congress Weighs in on Komen Dispute

Updated: February 2, 2012 | 4:35 p.m.
February 2, 2012 | 4:31 p.m.

The White House is bathed in pink light for breast cancer awareness on Monday, Oct. 3, 2011. (Chet Susslin)

More than two dozen democratic senators have weighed in on the flap over a breast cancer charity's decision to stop funding Planned Parenthood clinics.

Susan G. Komen for the Cure, one of the highest-profile breast cancer charities in the United States, is under attack after reports it decided to stop funding Planned Parenthood clinics. Planned Parenthood says the decision was unexpected and linked to its support for abortion rights; Komen founder Nancy Brinker denies this.

At last count, 26 senators have signed the latter asking Brinker to reconsider.  

"We write to express our disappointment with Susan G. Komen for the Cure’s decision to cut funding for breast cancer prevention, screening, and education at Planned Parenthood health centers. This troubling decision threatens to reduce access to necessary, life-saving services," the letter reads.

"We urge Komen to reconsider its decision," adds the letter, signed by Sens. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md.,  Patty Murray, D-Wash., Mark Begich, D-Alaska, Max Baucus, D-Mont., and others

"It would be tragic if any woman —let alone thousands of women — lost access to these potentially life-saving screenings because of a politically motivated attack," the letter adds. "We earnestly hope that you will put women’s health before partisan politics."

On the House side, Rep. Mike Honda, D-Calif., was organizing a letter. "It is my sincere hope that the years of life-saving work that this organization has encouraged is not undone by this one ill-advised action. We must ask – in the strongest possible terms – that Susan G. Komen reconsider its decision, as the bravery of millions of survivors everywhere demands the same kind of bravery exhibited by the Komen Foundation," Honda said in a Facebook posting.

New York Rep. Nita Lowey didn't wait. “Allowing a sham political ‘investigation’ to derail widespread support for breast cancer research, as well as survivors, their families, and millions of other Americans would be a tragedy," Lowey wrote in her own letter.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.