Is Congress Going to Lift Its Ban on Abortion Funding for the Peace Corps’ Rape Victims?

The Senate is pushing to lift the ban, but the House has blocked the effort in recent years.

National Journal
Sophie Novack
June 23, 2014, 5:30 p.m.

Cur­rent law al­lows for an ex­cep­tion to the ban on fed­er­al fund­ing for abor­tions in the event of rape, in­cest, or life en­dan­ger­ment. Un­less you’re a Peace Corps vo­lun­teer.

Since 1979, in­sur­ance through the Peace Corps pro­gram has been pro­hib­ited from cov­er­ing abor­tions un­der any cir­cum­stance. Oth­er re­cip­i­ents of gov­ern­ment-sponsored in­sur­ance — in­clud­ing fed­er­al em­ploy­ees and Medi­caid re­cip­i­ents — do have ac­cess to cov­er­age in the above three cir­cum­stances. Con­gress also lif­ted a sim­il­ar ban for mem­bers of the mil­it­ary last year.

The pat­tern has been the same for the past sev­er­al years, with the Sen­ate amend­ing the ban on emer­gency abor­tion cov­er­age and the House up­hold­ing the pro­hib­i­tion. Without sup­port from both cham­bers, at­tempts to change the policy have re­peatedly fallen flat.

Those op­posed to the ban, however, have ex­pressed cau­tious op­tim­ism that at­ten­tion on the is­sue could in­crease the mo­mentum for change in the lower cham­ber.

The House Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee will hold a markup Tues­day of the FY 2015 State and For­eign Op­er­a­tions Ap­pro­pri­ations Bill, which in­cludes budget­ing for the Peace Corps. The le­gis­la­tion cur­rently main­tains the ban on emer­gency abor­tion fund­ing for vo­lun­teers.

The Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee voted last week to pass the FY 2015 State and For­eign Op­er­a­tions Ap­pro­pri­ations Bill, in­clud­ing lan­guage that lifts this re­stric­tion. The lan­guage passed last year in the same ap­pro­pri­ations bill as well. The le­gis­la­tion will go to the full Sen­ate for a vote.

Abor­tion-rights ad­voc­ates praised the com­mit­tee’s ac­tion, ur­ging the House to fol­low suit. The Peace Corps is 60 per­cent fe­male, and vo­lun­teers typ­ic­ally find them­selves in po­ten­tially ris­ki­er situ­ations than oth­er types of fed­er­al em­ploy­ees.

“We ap­plaud the mem­bers of the Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee for tak­ing this crit­ic­al step today and show­ing their re­spect and sup­port for the health and well-be­ing of Peace Corps vo­lun­teers,” said Nancy Northup, pres­id­ent and CEO of the Cen­ter for Re­pro­duct­ive Rights, in a state­ment. “Now is the mo­ment when Con­gress can fi­nally right this wrong. We strongly urge the House to fol­low the lead of their Sen­ate col­leagues and fi­nally provide wo­men in the Peace Corps with the equal health care cov­er­age they need and de­serve.”

There’s lim­ited reas­on to be­lieve this year will di­verge from pre­ced­ent, but it is the first time there is a stand-alone bill in the House to ad­dress the ban: the Peace Corps Equity Act of 2014, in­tro­duced in May by Demo­crat­ic Rep. Nita Lowey of New York. A cor­res­pond­ing bill was re­in­tro­duced by New Hamp­shire Demo­crat Jeanne Shaheen in the Sen­ate; ori­gin­ally the ef­fort was led by the late Sen. Frank Lauten­berg.

Pres­id­ent Obama has in­cluded cov­er­age for emer­gency abor­tion ser­vices for Peace Corps vo­lun­teers in his budget pro­pos­al for the past two years.

The House Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee de­clined to com­ment on wheth­er there’s any pos­sib­il­ity of an abor­tion-fund­ing pro­vi­sion passing the House.

“The Com­mit­tee does not spec­u­late on fu­ture le­gis­lat­ive ac­tions, or the fi­nal out­come of pro­vi­sions or fund­ing levels,” House Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or Jen­nifer Hing wrote in an email on Monday. “The bill will of course be sub­ject to amend­ment both in full com­mit­tee to­mor­row, and on the House floor.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×